From: owner-skunk-works-digest@netwrx1.com (skunk-works-digest) To: skunk-works-digest@netwrx1.com Subject: skunk-works-digest V9 #36 Reply-To: skunk-works@netwrx1.com Sender: owner-skunk-works-digest@netwrx1.com Errors-To: owner-skunk-works-digest@netwrx1.com Precedence: bulk skunk-works-digest Tuesday, May 9 2000 Volume 09 : Number 036 Index of this digest by subject: *************************************************** THAAD vs. SR-71 Re: THAAD vs. SR-71 Re: THAAD vs. SR-71 Re: THAAD vs. SR-71 Re: THAAD vs. SR-71 Re: FWD (SW) Re: Gary Powers To Be Honored [Tesla EM weapon] Pilots Snoozed in Stealth Bombers Re: Pilots Snoozed in Stealth Bombers Who was Sam? Re: Who was Sam? Re: White F-117A Re: Who was Sam? Gary Powers To Be Honored - response *************************************************** ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 15:23:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Wei-Jen Su Subject: THAAD vs. SR-71 Talking about shooting down aircraft... Do you think that the new Theater High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) could shoot down a SR-71 easily? This is a good topic to be debate... May the Force be with you Wei-Jen Su E-mail: wsu@its.caltech.edu - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ "...When the child was a child it was the time of these questions: Why am I me, and why not you? Why am I here, and why not there? When did time begin, and where does space end?..." Peter Handke ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 19:02:19 +0100 From: "Gavin Payne" Subject: Re: THAAD vs. SR-71 Errrr kind of related, did the SR-71 or the U-2 ever carry active ECM gear for use against ground defences? Are there any limitations due to altitude? > > Talking about shooting down aircraft... Do you think that the new > Theater High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) could shoot down a SR-71 > easily? This is a good topic to be debate... > > May the Force be with you > > Wei-Jen Su > E-mail: wsu@its.caltech.edu > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > "...When the child was a child > it was the time of these questions: > Why am I me, and why not you? > Why am I here, and why not there? > When did time begin, and where does space end?..." > > Peter Handke > > > ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 04 May 2000 07:20:13 -0700 From: Timothy Toth Subject: Re: THAAD vs. SR-71 I can not say for sure if the SR-71 or the U-2 have active ECM, however one source I read from claiming to have worked on the SR-71 says that "The aircraft’s speed and altitude capabilities, together with its electronic systems, make it virtually invulnerable from attack by air-to-air and ground-to-air missiles." . Off course this could just be a very sensitive/precise ESM/RWR system, which gives the aircraft enough time to take 'evasive manoeuvres'. The same source says that a reason given for the retirement of the SR-71 was that it was unnecessary because a "new" ECM system for the U-2 was imminent, but that this system has yet to materialize. Which would imply that the U-2 has an active ECM system, even though it is outdated. It is pretty hard to evaluate the chances of downing an SR-71 (even with THAAD), but here are a few things I read: - - At the altitude the aircraft flies, conventional missiles are less maneouverable, and conventional warheads less effective. The only way to down it with the missiles the Russians had was to use their nuclear armed SAMs.Off course THAAD is a hit-to-kill weapon. - - The SR-71 has a low RCS (approx 0.55sqm?, but not balanced) but some radars are capable of detecting it from long distances, maybe by detecting it's exhaust plume. - - The SR-71 was 'intercepted' only once and not long before it's retirement. This was done by coordinating an intercept by 5 MIG-31's guided by ground controlers to come from all sectors. This tactic had to be used because on previous attempts the SR-71 had simply avoided and/or outrun it's opponents. Timothy Gavin Payne wrote: > Errrr kind of related, did the SR-71 or the U-2 ever carry active ECM gear > for use against ground defences? Are there any limitations due to altitude? > > > > > Talking about shooting down aircraft... Do you think that the new > > Theater High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) could shoot down a SR-71 > > easily? This is a good topic to be debate... > > > > May the Force be with you > > > > Wei-Jen Su ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 04 May 2000 12:22:13 -0500 From: Shade Subject: Re: THAAD vs. SR-71  

Timothy Toth wrote:

I can not say for sure if the SR-71 or the U-2 have active ECM, however one
source I read from claiming to have worked on the SR-71 says that "The
aircraft’s speed and altitude capabilities, together with its electronic
systems, make it virtually invulnerable from
attack by air-to-air and ground-to-air missiles." . Off course this could just
be a very sensitive/precise ESM/RWR system, which gives the aircraft enough time
to take 'evasive manoeuvres'.
I have always assumed that the SR-71 had some sort of jamming gear because I don't think it is capable of any sort of evasive manuevers. What does it take like 60 miles to turn it around? I've always heard that all it's missions are planned well in advance and they fly according to plan. It seems to me that to do so it would surely have an ECM package. Just my opinion.
- At the altitude the aircraft flies, conventional missiles are less
maneouverable, and conventional warheads less effective. The only way to down it
with the missiles the Russians had was to use their nuclear armed SAMs.Off
course THAAD is a hit-to-kill weapon.
Sounds accurate. A missle has really small wings and in thinner air it wouldn't have much to manuever with. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 16:26:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Wei-Jen Su Subject: Re: THAAD vs. SR-71 On Thu, 4 May 2000, Shade wrote: > - At the altitude the aircraft flies, conventional missiles > are less > maneouverable, and conventional warheads less effective. > The only way to down it > with the missiles the Russians had was to use their nuclear > armed SAMs.Off > course THAAD is a hit-to-kill weapon. > > Sounds accurate. A missle has really small wings and in thinner air it > wouldn't have much to manuever with. I believe THAAD use thrust vectoring... Therefore, no matter the altitude, is still highly manueverble. The SR-71 is not maneueverble at high altitude, but with the speed it has, even one degree of change, it will change the course by a couple of miles away! May the Force be with you Wei-Jen Su E-mail: wsu@its.caltech.edu - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ "...When the child was a child it was the time of these questions: Why am I me, and why not you? Why am I here, and why not there? When did time begin, and where does space end?..." Peter Handke ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 04 May 2000 19:35:47 -0700 From: "Terry W. Colvin" Subject: Re: FWD (SW) Re: Gary Powers To Be Honored [Tesla EM weapon] HNMho [TLCB] wrote: > > How would it jam the engine and controls? - -- Terry W. Colvin, Sierra Vista, Arizona (USA) < fortean1@frontiernet.net > Home Page: < http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Stargate/8958/index.html > Sites: Fortean Times * Northwest Mysteries * Mystic's Cyberpage * TLCB * U.S. Message Text Formatting (USMTF) Program - ------------ Member: Thailand-Laos-Cambodia Brotherhood (TLCB) Mailing List TLCB Web Site: < http://www.tlc-brotherhood.org > Southeast Asia (SEA) service: Vietnam - Theater Telecommunications Center/HHC, 1st Aviation Brigade (Jan 71 - Aug 72) Thailand/Laos - Telecommunications Center/U.S. Army Support Thailand (USARSUPTHAI), Camp Samae San (Jan 73 - Aug 73) - Special Security/Strategic Communications - Thailand (STRATCOM - Thailand), Phu Mu (Pig Mountain) Signal Site (Aug 73 - Jan 74) ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 04 May 2000 23:43:09 -0700 From: "Terry W. Colvin" Subject: Pilots Snoozed in Stealth Bombers LONDON (Reuters) - U.S. pilots flew 30-hour missions during the Kosovo conflict thanks to power naps taken in garden chairs wedged into the cockpits of their stealth bombers, a London-based defense magazine said Wednesday. The "lounging lawn chairs" were added to the B-2 Spirits to enable U.S. Air Force pilots to fly sustained long-distance missions to Kosovo from an air force base in the United States, the weekly Jane's International Defense Review said. The two pilots in each bomber could take it in turns to snooze in the chair, which "fits into the space behind the seats (in the cockpit) and raises the pilot clear of vibration from the floor," the Review said. The chairs, which cost $8.88 from the supermarket chain Wal-Mart, proved an invaluable addition to the B-2 Spirits, which at $1 billion each are the most expensive bombers in the world. Ed Heyliger - -- Terry W. Colvin, Sierra Vista, Arizona (USA) < fortean1@frontiernet.net > Home Page: < http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Stargate/8958/index.html > Sites: Fortean Times * Northwest Mysteries * Mystic's Cyberpage * TLCB * U.S. Message Text Formatting (USMTF) Program - ------------ Member: Thailand-Laos-Cambodia Brotherhood (TLCB) Mailing List TLCB Web Site: < http://www.tlc-brotherhood.org > Southeast Asia (SEA) service: Vietnam - Theater Telecommunications Center/HHC, 1st Aviation Brigade (Jan 71 - Aug 72) Thailand/Laos - Telecommunications Center/U.S. Army Support Thailand (USARSUPTHAI), Camp Samae San (Jan 73 - Aug 73) - Special Security/Strategic Communications - Thailand (STRATCOM - Thailand), Phu Mu (Pig Mountain) Signal Site (Aug 73 - Jan 74) ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 04:01:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Sam Kaltsidis Subject: Re: Pilots Snoozed in Stealth Bombers > LONDON (Reuters) - U.S. pilots flew 30-hour missions during the Kosovo > conflict thanks to power naps taken in garden chairs wedged into the > cockpits of their stealth bombers, a London-based defense magazine said > Wednesday. The "lounging lawn chairs" were added to the B-2 Spirits to > enable U.S. Air Force pilots to fly sustained long-distance missions to > Kosovo from an air force base in the United States, the weekly Jane's > International Defense Review said. The two pilots in each bomber could > take it in turns to snooze in the chair, which "fits into the space > behind the seats (in the cockpit) and raises the pilot clear of > vibration from the floor," the Review said. > > The chairs, which cost $8.88 from the supermarket chain Wal-Mart, proved > an invaluable addition to the B-2 Spirits, which at $1 billion each are > the most expensive bombers in the world. Actually they cost over $2.6 billion a piece. > > Ed Heyliger > > -- > Terry W. Colvin, Sierra Vista, Arizona (USA) > < fortean1@frontiernet.net > > Home Page: < http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Stargate/8958/index.html > > Sites: Fortean Times * Northwest Mysteries * Mystic's Cyberpage * > TLCB * U.S. Message Text Formatting (USMTF) Program > ------------ > Member: Thailand-Laos-Cambodia Brotherhood (TLCB) Mailing List > TLCB Web Site: < http://www.tlc-brotherhood.org > > Southeast Asia (SEA) service: > Vietnam - Theater Telecommunications Center/HHC, 1st Aviation Brigade > (Jan 71 - Aug 72) > Thailand/Laos > - Telecommunications Center/U.S. Army Support Thailand > (USARSUPTHAI), Camp Samae San (Jan 73 - Aug 73) > - Special Security/Strategic Communications - Thailand > (STRATCOM - Thailand), Phu Mu (Pig Mountain) Signal Site > (Aug 73 - Jan 74) ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 13:12:31 -0500 From: "Allen Thomson" Subject: Who was Sam? In the very nice Groom Lake/A51 article in the 1 May 2000 AWST, it notes that Sam's Club, besides being famous for its shrimp(*), was "named after the last CIA director of Groom Lake, who left in the late 1970s." Does history record or suggest who Sam was, or anything about his tenure there? (*) The analytical significance of this is open to question, but the NRO Christmas parties are said to feature wonderful shrimp also. Alas, I've never been invited to one and so can't offer personal witness. Maybe this year. ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 23:33:01 -0500 From: "Albert H. Dobyns" Subject: Re: Who was Sam? Allen Thomson wrote: > > In the very nice Groom Lake/A51 article in the 1 May 2000 AWST, it notes > that Sam's Club, besides being famous for its shrimp(*), was "named after > the last CIA director of Groom Lake, who left in the late 1970s." > > Does history record or suggest who Sam was, or anything about his tenure > there? > > (*) The analytical significance of this is open to question, but the NRO > Christmas parties are said to feature wonderful shrimp also. Alas, I've > never been invited to one and so can't offer personal witness. Maybe this > year. At first, when I saw "Sam's Club" I thought you were referring to the discount shopping center and was wondering how they ever got one established at G.L.!! I hope someone does know the name. Shrimp at Groom Lake!!? Definitely something that would have to be brought in by Janet flights or bus or whatever. ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 6 May 2000 02:38:48 EDT From: Xelex@aol.com Subject: Re: White F-117A The mystery of the white F-117A is solved. On 14 April 2000, F-117A (85-0816) was conducting a functional test flight after completing a modification upgrade with new exterior low observables materials. The aircraft had received a white primer coating and was flown prior to the application of final coating of black paint. The aircraft has since been redelivered to the 49th Fighter Wing at Holloman AFB, New Mexico and is assigned to the 8th Fighter Squadron. This begins the first major supportability upgrade to the F-117 Nighthawk low observables system. The planning for this upgrade was developed more than two years ago and on 26 April delivery was accomplished on schedule. Follow-on modifications will be conducted and completion of the fleet upgrade is planned for 2005. Peter Merlin ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 06 May 2000 07:43:54 -0700 From: Timothy Toth Subject: Re: Who was Sam? Hmmm, maybe they have created desert Shrimps with they aide of alien technology. :-) Timothy > > > (*) The analytical significance of this is open to question, but the NRO > > Christmas parties are said to feature wonderful shrimp also. Alas, I've > > never been invited to one and so can't offer personal witness. Maybe this > > year. > > Shrimp at Groom Lake!!? Definitely something that would have to be > brought in by Janet flights or bus or whatever. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 09 May 2000 15:59:36 -0700 From: "A.J. Craddock" Subject: Gary Powers To Be Honored - response - --=====================_367710427==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Terry Hope the following helps explain your questions. Note that these weapons can be aimed with an accuracy of around 6 inches. As 256 innocent Americans died needlessly in this incident, the least we can do for them and their families is shine the light of truth on the events. Not to mention that the very same longitudinal-wave EM technology has been proven 40 years ago to reverse cancers in thousands of rigorous tests by the French Academy of Sciences. Tony Craddock _________________ Death of the Arrow DC-8 Soviet tests against actual U.S. targets continued over the years. In 1972 at a secret meeting in Prague of the leaders of the European Communist parties, Leonid Brezhnev confirmed that detente was a hoax (just as Gorbachev's Glasnost is a hoax!). Brezhnev named 1985 as the year that the Soviets would be ready to control the skies, the oceans, and most of the land area as they might wish. In other words, all the great strategic scalar EM weapons would be completed, deployed, and operationally tested. On December 12, 1985, Soviet ''over-the-horizon radars" - with infolded Whittaker bidirectional EM wave structures to provide distance-independent holography and dispersion-free phase conjugate shooting - locked-on and destroyed a U.S. Arrow Airlines DC-8 jet aircraft at Gander International Airport, Newfoundland. In destroying the aircraft as a demonstration that the 1985 schedule had been met and the Americans were none the wiser, the Soviets killed 248 U.S. Army troops and 8 civilian crewmembers. [See Figure 21 http://www.cseti.org/bearden/gravitobiology/fig21.jpg]. The troops were U.S. paratroopers returning to their home station from UN peacekeeping duties in the Middle East. They were coming home for Christmas, and their parents, families, and friends were waiting for them in happy anticipation. The terrible tragedy took those happy young lives, and the lives of the fine Arrow crew - one of its best. It was not an accident, and it was not a terrorist bomb that destroyed the aircraft and killed all those young soldiers and the crew. It was a brutal, cynical, overt act of war by the Soviet Union. It was the final demonstration to Gorbachev of meeting the Soviet 1985 schedule for having these giant weapons deployed and operationally ready and tested. Just two weeks earlier, the weapon had been tested for the third time against a U.S. shuttle launch, but in a nondestructive manner. Some six weeks after killing the Arrow, the same weaponry would be used in a highly specialized kill of the Challenger with its crew of seven. But here is what really happened to the Arrow DC-8 on December 12, 1985. For brevity, we skip all preliminaries, and go immediately to the aircraft as it built up speed down the runway on its takeoff run. As the Arrow DC-8 aircraft sped down the runway, an eyewitness observed multiple beams of light form in the clouds overhead - in fact, she observed the self-focusing of the scalar potential beams of the interferometer. This self-focusing (self-targeting) began to cause electrostatic cooling in the aircraft engines' combustion gases. This is easily accomplished by properly adjusting the bias potential on the electrical ground of the distant interferometer transmitters in Russia, so that the transmitter potential is below the ambient potential of the target - the aircraft speeding down the runway in Newfoundland. If the transmitter potential is lower, a gradient exists in the scalar beam Whittaker structure joining the aircraft and the Russian transmitters, and energy will flow through the internal Whittaker structures, from hot spots on the airplane - such as the fiercely burning combustion gases - to the distant transmitter electrical ground. This will electrostatically cool the greatest hot spots - the hot combustion gases inside the engines. The electrostatic cooling in the combustion gases inside the engines caused them to lose exhaust gas velocity, hence reducing the engines' thrust - just at takeoff rotation. As the aircraft began to rotate for liftoff, its engines were already losing substantial thrust, although they were still rotating at full speed. Once the weapon was focused, Soviets fired an electromagnetic missile directly at the aircraft, using distance-independent holography, employing the internal Whittaker EM wave structures of the scalar potential beams. The interfering sky beams flared as an electromagnetic missile formed and shot to the aircraft. (The EM missile strike was seen by the witness as just a ball or beam of light that streaked from the glowing beams in the clouds, down to the aircraft.) The EM missile struck the aircraft in the right side of its fuselage ahead of the engines and blasted a hole right through the fuselage. This anomalous hole was noted. It was tested and found to have no chemical residues, proving that it was not due to a chemical explosion or a terrorist bomb However, it was due to the strike of the EM missile! The fierce ball of EM energy penetrated the fuselage and struck the aircraft's interior plastics, explosively igniting them instantly - all just at liftoff. Multiple independent witnesses saw the aircraft glowing with an orange light, from the fierce firelight shining out the windows and the radiant energy of the locked-on interferometry beams. Interestingly, the witness that saw the beams form in the sky, and the beam shoot down and strike the aircraft, was not allowed to present her testimony to the official board of investigation The flaring of the skybeams associated with the EM missile strike, and the glow on the aircraft from the electrical energy in the locked-on scalar EM beams, brightly lit up the cabs of trucks speeding down the nearby highway. The strike of the EM missile also caused a sharp electrical spike in two instruments on board the aircraft, as recorded by the flight recorder. The instruments and the flight recorder actually recorded the strike of the EM missile itself: [Figure 22 http://www.cseti.org/bearden/gravitobiology/fig22.jpg]. The aircraft was glowing from the Whittaker beam structure holography and beam tracking and self-targeting. Inside the struck aircraft, in addition to the explosive fire and fierce firelight, violent outgassing from the explosive ignition of the plastics produced an explosion of soot and toxic fumes, including highly lethal hydrogen cyanide gas. With a breath or two, lethal doses of the toxic fumes were inhaled by the surrounding occupants. About half the personnel on board were already dead or dying of cyanide poisoning as the faltering plane reached its high point of less than 100 feet, still tail-down. The U.S. Army performed autopsies on the remains of almost all the dead personnel in the crash. These autopsies indicated that almost half the personnel were already dead of hydrogen cyanide poisoning before the airplane exploded on impact with the earth This autopsy information was illegally withheld from the official investigating board for the accident - another deliberate criminal interference with the proceedings. But to return to the faltering Arrow DC-8. With its engine thrust steadily diminishing by electrostatic cooling of engine combustion gases, even though the turbines were rotating at good speed, the stricken aircraft sank, still tail down, and struck the ground, exploding and killing the remaining personnel on board, and scattering the burning wreckage over the crash area. However, the sharp strike of the EM missile with its extremely powerful associated scalar EM pulse had intensely "quick-charged" and activated the atomic nuclei of aircraft materials, metals, etc in the adjacent areas of the aircraft surrounding the strike. These Whittaker/scalar-activated (scalar-charged) nuclei were now emitting strong scalar graviton radiation So strong scalar graviton radiation - scalar potential radiation - was issuing from the scattered parts and burning materials in the crash area. During the next few days, recovery personnel were exposed to this unsuspected scalar radiation. Many of them (about 60 or so) later developed delayed illnesses and health changes similar to those in scalar-radiated U.S. Embassy personnel in Moscow: dizziness, headaches, nausea, stomach and intestinal upset, liver changes, blood changes, vertigo, and stress syndrome symptoms. We accent this point most strongly: We have seen these symptoms before, in personnel radiated by the Soviets at the U S. Embassy in Moscow. The Johns Hopkins study of that situation clearly shows that the active ingredient is the scalar potential, not ordinary EM force fields. We know it is scalar EM potential radiation that causes these delayed health symptoms. Further, from our study of the Kaznacheyev cytopathogenic effect; the Popp cellular communication system, and the Priore anticancer machine, we know the precise mechanism that causes the diseases. The signatures of the use of the scalar EM weapon are clear. Further, additional strong evidence exists of prior 1985 nonlethal testing of the same weapon that was utilized to kill the Arrow DC-8. - - - The remainder of this Article can be seen at http://www.cseti.org/bearden/gravitobiology/dc8.htm Excerpted from: "Gravitobiology" by Lt. Col. Tom Bearden (retd.), 1991 At 07:35 PM 5/4/00 -0700, you wrote: >HNMho [TLCB] wrote: > > > > How would it jam the engine and controls? > >-- >Terry W. Colvin, Sierra Vista, Arizona (USA) >< fortean1@frontiernet.net > >Home Page: < http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Stargate/8958/index.html > >Sites: Fortean Times * Northwest Mysteries * Mystic's Cyberpage * > TLCB * U.S. Message Text Formatting (USMTF) Program >------------ >Member: Thailand-Laos-Cambodia Brotherhood (TLCB) Mailing List > TLCB Web Site: < http://www.tlc-brotherhood.org > >Southeast Asia (SEA) service: >Vietnam - Theater Telecommunications Center/HHC, 1st Aviation Brigade > (Jan 71 - Aug 72) >Thailand/Laos > - Telecommunications Center/U.S. Army Support Thailand > (USARSUPTHAI), Camp Samae San (Jan 73 - Aug 73) > - Special Security/Strategic Communications - Thailand > (STRATCOM - Thailand), Phu Mu (Pig Mountain) Signal Site > (Aug 73 - Jan 74) - --=====================_367710427==_.ALT Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Terry

Hope the following helps explain your questions.

Note that these weapons can be aimed with an accuracy of around 6 inches.

As 256 innocent Americans died needlessly in this incident, the least we can do for them and their families is shine the light of truth on the events.

Not to mention that the very same longitudinal-wave EM technology has been proven 40 years ago to reverse cancers in thousands of rigorous tests by the French Academy of Sciences.

Tony Craddock

_________________

Death of the Arrow DC-8

Soviet tests against actual U.S. targets continued over the years. In 1972 at a secret meeting in Prague of the leaders of the European Communist parties, Leonid Brezhnev confirmed that detente was a hoax (just as Gorbachev's Glasnost is a hoax!). Brezhnev named 1985 as the year that the Soviets would be ready to control the skies, the oceans, and most of the land area as they might wish. In other words, all the great strategic scalar EM weapons would be completed, deployed, and operationally tested.

On December 12, 1985, Soviet ''over-the-horizon radars" - with infolded Whittaker bidirectional EM wave structures to provide distance-independent holography and dispersion-free phase conjugate shooting - locked-on and destroyed a U.S. Arrow Airlines DC-8 jet aircraft at Gander International Airport, Newfoundland. In destroying the aircraft as a demonstration that the 1985 schedule had been met and the Americans were none the wiser, the Soviets killed 248 U.S. Army troops and 8 civilian crewmembers.

[See Figure 21 http://www.cseti.org/bearden/gravitobiology/fig21.jpg]. The troops were U.S. paratroopers returning to their home station from UN peacekeeping duties in the Middle East. They were coming home for Christmas, and their parents, families, and friends were waiting for them in happy anticipation. The terrible tragedy took those happy young lives, and the lives of the fine Arrow crew - one of its best. It was not an accident, and it was not a terrorist bomb that destroyed the aircraft and killed all those young soldiers and the crew. It was a brutal, cynical, overt act of war by the Soviet Union. It was the final demonstration to Gorbachev of meeting the Soviet 1985 schedule for having these giant weapons deployed and operationally ready and tested. Just two weeks earlier, the weapon had been tested for the third time against a U.S. shuttle launch, but in a nondestructive manner. Some six weeks after killing the Arrow, the same weaponry would be used in a highly specialized kill of the Challenger with its crew of seven. But here is what really happened to the Arrow DC-8 on December 12, 1985.

For brevity, we skip all preliminaries, and go immediately to the aircraft as it built up speed down the runway on its takeoff run. As the Arrow DC-8 aircraft sped down the runway, an eyewitness observed multiple beams of light form in the clouds overhead - in fact, she observed the self-focusing of the scalar potential beams of the interferometer. This self-focusing (self-targeting) began to cause electrostatic cooling in the aircraft engines' combustion gases. This is easily accomplished by properly adjusting the bias potential on the electrical ground of the distant interferometer transmitters in Russia, so that the transmitter potential is below the ambient potential of the target - the aircraft speeding down the runway in Newfoundland. If the transmitter potential is lower, a gradient exists in the scalar beam Whittaker structure joining the aircraft and the Russian transmitters, and energy will flow through the internal Whittaker structures, from hot spots on the airplane - such as the fiercely burning combustion gases - to the distant transmitter electrical ground. This will electrostatically cool the greatest hot spots - the hot combustion gases inside the engines.

The electrostatic cooling in the combustion gases inside the engines caused them to lose exhaust gas velocity, hence reducing the engines' thrust - just at takeoff rotation. As the aircraft began to rotate for liftoff, its engines were already losing substantial thrust, although they were still rotating at full speed.

Once the weapon was focused, Soviets fired an electromagnetic missile directly at the aircraft, using distance-independent holography, employing the internal Whittaker EM wave structures of the scalar potential beams. The interfering sky beams flared as an electromagnetic missile formed and shot to the aircraft. (The EM missile strike was seen by the witness as just a ball or beam of light that streaked from the glowing beams in the clouds, down to the aircraft.) The EM missile struck the aircraft in the right side of its fuselage ahead of the engines and blasted a hole right through the fuselage. This anomalous hole was noted. It was tested and found to have no chemical residues, proving that it was not due to a chemical explosion or a terrorist bomb However, it was due to the strike of the EM missile!=20

The fierce ball of EM energy penetrated the fuselage and struck the aircraft's interior plastics, explosively igniting them instantly - all just at liftoff. Multiple independent witnesses saw the aircraft glowing with an orange light, from the fierce firelight shining out the windows and the radiant energy of the locked-on interferometry beams. Interestingly, the witness that saw the beams form in the sky, and the beam shoot down and strike the aircraft, was not allowed to present her testimony to the official board of investigation

The flaring of the skybeams associated with the EM missile strike, and the glow on the aircraft from the electrical energy in the locked-on scalar EM beams, brightly lit up the cabs of trucks speeding down the nearby highway. The strike of the EM missile also caused a sharp electrical spike in two instruments on board the aircraft, as recorded by the flight recorder. The instruments and the flight recorder actually recorded the strike of the EM missile itself: [Figure 22 http://www.cseti.org/bearden/gravitobiology/fig22.jpg]. The aircraft was glowing from the Whittaker beam structure holography and beam tracking and self-targeting. Inside the struck aircraft, in addition to the explosive fire and fierce firelight, violent outgassing from the explosive ignition of the plastics produced an explosion of soot and toxic fumes, including highly lethal hydrogen cyanide gas. With a breath or two, lethal doses of the toxic fumes were inhaled by the surrounding occupants. About half the personnel on board were already dead or dying of cyanide poisoning as the faltering plane reached its high point of less than 100 feet, still tail-down.

The U.S. Army performed autopsies on the remains of almost all the dead personnel in the crash. These autopsies indicated that almost half the personnel were already dead of hydrogen cyanide poisoning before the airplane exploded on impact with the earth This autopsy information was illegally withheld from the official investigating board for the accident - - another deliberate criminal interference with the proceedings.

But to return to the faltering Arrow DC-8. With its engine thrust steadily diminishing by electrostatic cooling of engine combustion gases, even though the turbines were rotating at good speed, the stricken aircraft sank, still tail down, and struck the ground, exploding and killing the remaining personnel on board, and scattering the burning wreckage over the crash area. However, the sharp strike of the EM missile with its extremely powerful associated scalar EM pulse had intensely "quick-charged" and activated the atomic nuclei of aircraft materials, metals, etc in the adjacent areas of the aircraft surrounding the strike. These Whittaker/scalar-activated (scalar-charged) nuclei were now emitting strong scalar graviton radiation So strong scalar graviton radiation - scalar potential radiation - was issuing from the scattered parts and burning materials in the crash area. During the next few days, recovery personnel were exposed to this unsuspected scalar radiation. Many of them (about 60 or so) later developed delayed illnesses and health changes similar to those in scalar-radiated U.S. Embassy personnel in Moscow: dizziness, headaches, nausea, stomach and intestinal upset, liver changes, blood changes, vertigo, and stress syndrome symptoms.

We accent this point most strongly: We have seen these symptoms before, in personnel radiated by the Soviets at the U S. Embassy in Moscow. The Johns Hopkins study of that situation clearly shows that the active ingredient is the scalar potential, not ordinary EM force fields. We know it is scalar EM potential radiation that causes these delayed health symptoms. Further, from our study of the Kaznacheyev cytopathogenic effect; the Popp cellular communication system, and the Priore anticancer machine, we know the precise mechanism that causes the diseases.

The signatures of the use of the scalar EM weapon are clear. Further, additional strong evidence exists of prior 1985 nonlethal testing of the same weapon that was utilized to kill the Arrow DC-8.

- - - The remainder of this Article can be seen at http://www.cseti.org/bearden/gravitobiology/dc8.htm<= br>
Excerpted from:
"Gravitobiology"
by Lt. Col. Tom Bearden (retd.), 1991


At 07:35 PM 5/4/00 -0700, you wrote:
HNMho [TLCB] wrote:
>
> How would it jam the engine and controls?

- --
Terry W. Colvin, Sierra Vista, Arizona (USA)
< fortean1@frontiernet.net >
Home Page: < http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Stargate/8958/index.html >
Sites: Fortean Times * Northwest Mysteries * Mystic's Cyberpage *
   TLCB * U.S. Message Text Formatting (USMTF) Program
- ------------
Member: Thailand-Laos-Cambodia Brotherhood (TLCB) Mailing List
   TLCB Web Site: < http://www.tlc-brotherhood.org >
Southeast Asia (SEA) service:
Vietnam - Theater Telecommunications Center/HHC, 1st Aviation Brigade
   (Jan 71 - Aug 72)
Thailand/Laos
 - Telecommunications Center/U.S. Army Support Thailand
   (USARSUPTHAI), Camp Samae San (Jan 73 - Aug 73)
 - Special Security/Strategic Communications - Thailand
   (STRATCOM - Thailand), Phu Mu (Pig Mountain) Signal Site
   (Aug 73 - Jan 74)
- --=====================_367710427==_.ALT-- ------------------------------ End of skunk-works-digest V9 #36 ******************************** To subscribe to skunk-works-digest, send the command: subscribe in the body of a message to "majordomo@netwrx1.com". If you want to subscribe something other than the account the mail is coming from, such as a local redistribution list, then append that address to the "subscribe" command; for example, to subscribe "local-skunk-works": subscribe local-skunk-works@your.domain.net To unsubscribe, send mail to the same address, with the command: unsubscribe in the body. Administrative requests, problems, and other non-list mail can be sent to georgek@netwrx1.com. A non-digest (direct mail) version of this list is also available; to subscribe to that instead, replace all instances of "skunk-works-digest" in the commands above with "skunk-works". Back issues are available for viewing by a www interface located at: http://www.netwrx1.com/skunk-works/ If you have any questions or problems please contact me at: georgek@netwrx1.com Thanks, George R. Kasica Listowner