From: owner-skunk-works-digest@netwrx1.com (skunk-works-digest) To: skunk-works-digest@netwrx1.com Subject: skunk-works-digest V9 #68 Reply-To: skunk-works@netwrx1.com Sender: owner-skunk-works-digest@netwrx1.com Errors-To: owner-skunk-works-digest@netwrx1.com Precedence: bulk skunk-works-digest Thursday, September 7 2000 Volume 09 : Number 068 Index of this digest by subject: *************************************************** Con/Chem-Trails, & 'going stealthy'. Re: Duxford RE: Duxford Re: FWD (SK) More Kursk conspiracy RE: FWD (SK) More Kursk conspiracy RE: Duxford Re: Tailgate Party in Rachel, NV(10-28-00) Re: Clearances, compartments, etc. Re: Clearances, compartments, etc. Re: FWD (SK) More Kursk conspiracy OFF-TOPIC(?): RM-82/84/85/86 FWD (EXT/UASR) Re: Anti Zeppelin systems & Flying triangles in the sky Re: Panther Piss News on the F-22 program Yahoo! News Story - Two Die in France Plane Crash *************************************************** ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2000 18:57:20 EDT From: SecretJet@aol.com Subject: Con/Chem-Trails, & 'going stealthy'. In a message dated 9/1/00 1:28:46 AM GMT Daylight Time, owner-skunk-works-digest@netwrx1.com writes: << >I take the expression "turned on the stealth" to mean that the lights were >killed, radar reflecting protuberances removed and the anti-contrail fuel >additive turned on. Anyone care to comment on this "anti-contrail" fuel additive? >> Oh-oh, I feel the 'Chem-Trailers' closing in! (& Regarding the Brits "going stealthy", I think it also refers to radio/comms security, as well as 'external' items). - ------------------------------------------------------ Regards, Bill Turner, 'Admin'. Black-Triangle E-Group HQ. Near London Heathrow, UK. AIM: Secretjet / Secretjet2 ICQ: 29271956 - ----------------------------------------------------------------- Monitoring S.E.UK Mil-Airband on Yupi 7100 - ----------------------------------------------------------------- http://members.aol.com/ Secretjet/ No Door is Closed - To an Open Mind! - ----------------------------------------------------------------- Wesley's Photo Page ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 03 Sep 100 00:15:40 GMT From: betnal@ns.net Subject: Re: Duxford On 8/29/00 9:36PM, in message <39AC8F37.7B59C3DC@worldnet.att.net>, "Albert H. Dobyns" wrote: > John Szalay wrote: > > > > May be old news, But. > > According to the newsletter for the Duxford UK air museum . > > They have announced in the Summer 2000 adition that SR-71 tail number 962 > > which is currently stored at Palmdale, has been allocated to Duxford. > > The aircraft is disassembled and shipped to England. and they hope to have > > it on display sometime in Sept . (hopefully for thier airshow Sept 9-10) > > > That's the first I've read about an SR being sent to a > museum outside the US. Lucky guys!! > Al > Air Forces Monthly also reported the same thing a couple of months back, but this is the first confirmation I've heard of from Duxford. Art ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 03 Sep 100 00:52:22 GMT From: betnal@ns.net Subject: RE: Duxford On 8/30/00 6:55PM, in message <3.0.6.32.20000830215526.007bd820@postoffice.worldnet.att.net>, John Szalay wrote: > One thing I did,nt mention, the article stated that the aircraft had been > already stripped of all parts that are needed for possible reactivation of > reserve > aircraft, such as seats, life support ETC: > > > Well, except for the NASA birds, there are no reserve aircraft. There's also no way USAF will ever let this plane enter service again. Art ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 03 Sep 100 00:54:47 GMT From: betnal@ns.net Subject: Re: FWD (SK) More Kursk conspiracy Couple of other notes: Kursk also was probably armed with rocket-propelled torpedoes which travel through the water at up to 200 knots. In addition, when tehy were finally able to hook up with and open the aft hatch of the sub, they found it was totally flooded. This may mean the "tapping" could hgave been another lie put out. Art ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2000 19:37:58 +0100 From: "Gavin Payne" Subject: RE: FWD (SK) More Kursk conspiracy I agree. This is the country after all who, in front of the world's media, injected a screaming and protesting mother to get her out of site! > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-skunk-works@netwrx1.com > [mailto:owner-skunk-works@netwrx1.com]On Behalf Of betnal@ns.net > Sent: 01 January 1601 00:00 > To: skunk-works@netwrx1.com > Subject: Re: FWD (SK) More Kursk conspiracy > > > Couple of other notes: > > Kursk also was probably armed with rocket-propelled > torpedoes which travel > through the water at up to 200 knots. In addition, when tehy > were finally able > to hook up with and open the aft hatch of the sub, they found > it was totally > flooded. This may mean the "tapping" could hgave been > another lie put out. > > > > Art > > > ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2000 19:38:42 +0100 From: "Gavin Payne" Subject: RE: Duxford A USAF SR-71 will probably leave the runway the same day Concorde returns to the skys....:) > Well, except for the NASA birds, there are no reserve > aircraft. There's also > no way USAF will ever let this plane enter service again. ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2000 17:37:49 -0500 From: "Art Adams" Subject: Re: Tailgate Party in Rachel, NV(10-28-00) Sounds good to me, I'll see ya'll there. Art - ----- Original Message ----- From: C.F.A.3 To: ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; Cc: ; ; ; ; Sent: Monday, August 28, 2000 11:34 PM Subject: Tailgate Party in Rachel, NV(10-28-00) > At one point or another, I have had a conversation with you about > Military Air Craft, Nellis Range and/or Groom Lake. This will be a one > time e/mail. > > So... > > On Saturday, Oct. 28th, the AREA 51 RESEARCH CENTER in Rachel, NV., in > conjuction with the GROOM LAKE AUDUBON SOCIETY*, will be hosting a > little get together. We're calling it, for lack of a better name: > > THE AREA 51 / RED FLAG -- FAN APPRECIATION DAY--WEENIE > ROAST/BBQ/TAILGATE PARTY & B.S. SESSION. > > Don Emory and I have talked about inviting a bunch of the "like > minded" out for a "gathering", for over a year. Both of us get all kinds > of requests like this. So, here it is. > RED FLAG will be in full swing during the week, so there is a chance > that some of us will be there, anyways. For those that do, we can talk > about camping together. (We'll talk.) Don will be contacting Nellis, to > let them know, too. It might be nice to have visitors from the > excercise. (We'll cook 'em a hot dog, or something.) > Bring photos, scrap books, tall tales, ...whatever. NO BULL HORNS OR > SOAP BOXES ALLOWED! > > Go to www.area51researchcenter.com for updates. > > Tell a friend (not the enemies of) > Contact me if need be. > > Best to you all > C3(Imperial Leader of GLAS) > > http://community.webtv.net/CFA3/GroomLakeAudubon > > > ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2000 18:01:54 -0500 From: "Art Adams" Subject: Re: Clearances, compartments, etc. The 4 Qs that you see in the preamble of message traffic mean "flash override" QQQQ That's not a clearance designation. Art - ----- Original Message ----- From: Allen Thomson To: Skunk Works Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2000 2:16 PM Subject: Clearances, compartments, etc. > Al wondered and guessed, > > > ps: if I had gone through the whole interview process with the CIA, I > wonder what sort of > clearance I would have had. I guess ones like "L" and > "Q" were associated with AEC > > (old) and DOE gov't agencies. > > Nope, a blue CIA staff badge just gets you plain old TS. In the Directorate > of Intelligence, which works day to day with SIGINT and satellite pix, the > common clearance level adds SI/TK/G (denoted by an "H" on the badge). > > And, of course, there is a large variety of clearances associated with other > channels, compartments, subcompartments, levels, etc. scattered here and > there in various places around the Agency. Many of them, such as Q > clearances, are granted by other government entities. > > Such compartmentation can get in the way of getting the job done, as one > might imagine: see http://archives.his.com/intelforum/msg02009.html > > > > ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2000 21:47:08 -0700 From: "Terry W. Colvin" Subject: Re: Clearances, compartments, etc. The "QQQQ" designates end of security clearance and caveat(s). It is used in back-channel or DSSCS (Defense Special Secure Communication System) record networks. Levels of precedence: W = CRITIC (NSA) Y = Emergency Command Precedence (nuclear alert) Z = Flash O = Immediate P = Priority R = Routine Flash override is limited to telephone MLPP (Multi-Level Precedence and Pre-emption). Terry - ----- Art Adams wrote: > > The 4 Qs that you see in the preamble of message traffic mean "flash > override" > > QQQQ > > That's not a clearance designation. > > Art > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Allen Thomson > To: Skunk Works > Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2000 2:16 PM > Subject: Clearances, compartments, etc. > > > Al wondered and guessed, > > > > > ps: if I had gone through the whole interview process with the CIA, I > > wonder what sort of > clearance I would have had. I guess ones like "L" > and > > "Q" were associated with AEC > > > (old) and DOE gov't agencies. > > > > Nope, a blue CIA staff badge just gets you plain old TS. In the > Directorate > > of Intelligence, which works day to day with SIGINT and satellite pix, the > > common clearance level adds SI/TK/G (denoted by an "H" on the badge). > > > > And, of course, there is a large variety of clearances associated with > other > > channels, compartments, subcompartments, levels, etc. scattered here and > > there in various places around the Agency. Many of them, such as Q > > clearances, are granted by other government entities. > > > > Such compartmentation can get in the way of getting the job done, as one > > might imagine: see http://archives.his.com/intelforum/msg02009.html > > > > > > > > - -- Terry W. Colvin, Sierra Vista, Arizona (USA) < fortean1@frontiernet.net > Alternate: < terry_colvin@hotmail.com > Home Page: < http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Stargate/8958/index.html > Sites: Fortean Times * Northwest Mysteries * Mystic's Cyberpage * TLCB * U.S. Message Text Formatting (USMTF) Program - ------------ Member: Thailand-Laos-Cambodia Brotherhood (TLCB) Mailing List TLCB Web Site: < http://www.tlc-brotherhood.org >[Allies, CIA/NSA, and Vietnam veterans welcome] Southeast Asia (SEA) service: Vietnam - Theater Telecommunications Center/HHC, 1st Aviation Brigade (Jan 71 - Aug 72) Thailand/Laos - Telecommunications Center/U.S. Army Support Thailand (USARSUPTHAI), Camp Samae San (Jan 73 - Aug 73) - Special Security/Strategic Communications - Thailand (STRATCOM - Thailand), Phu Mu (Pig Mountain) Signal Site (Aug 73 - Jan 74) ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2000 22:32:46 -0700 From: "T.Toth" Subject: Re: FWD (SK) More Kursk conspiracy Just think for a moment, of what you thought would happen when the tragedy happened. I bet you thought Russian officials where going to have to pay for this, right. Funny how not so long ago it was still admitted that there would have been enough air until the 14th which is also the date that some Russian officials say was the last time they had communication with the crew. (off course this would have meant immediate Western assistance could have saved some of the crew). Now notice how slowly the Russian official version seems to be sliding inexorably towards, "everyone died in minutes" and "no one, not even the West could have saved them". And of course one ha to rememeber that it is the west who is responsible for the killing of the crew, some versions will say it was a US or British sub, other versions simply state that it is the west who have stolen and ripped apart Russia* so much that the Russian military have to put their lives at risk working in dreadful conditions. Next thing you'll know, the west will have to pay to raise the sub, because of the risk of leakage. And the Russian leaderhip may even go so far as to create some sort of official accusation stating that something is very fishy (no pun intended) because the US or the British do not want to admit that one of their subs was damaged, and that Russian military experts are not allowed to examine those subs to see if there are any proof of a collision. Only time will tell I guess, but one thing is certain there is definitely an intense political game being played, and a few careers are at risk, and in the eye of most of those guys I'm sure that's worth a little manipulation, and a few revised official versions, including the results of the 'investigations' being made. *allusion to supposed US, British and Turkish assistance to Chechnya I guess. Timothy Gavin Payne wrote: > I agree. This is the country after all who, in front of the world's media, > injected a screaming and protesting mother to get her out of site! > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-skunk-works@netwrx1.com > > [mailto:owner-skunk-works@netwrx1.com]On Behalf Of betnal@ns.net > > Sent: 01 January 1601 00:00 > > To: skunk-works@netwrx1.com > > Subject: Re: FWD (SK) More Kursk conspiracy > > > > > > Couple of other notes: > > > > Kursk also was probably armed with rocket-propelled > > torpedoes which travel > > through the water at up to 200 knots. In addition, when tehy > > were finally able > > to hook up with and open the aft hatch of the sub, they found > > it was totally > > flooded. This may mean the "tapping" could hgave been > > another lie put out. > > > > > > > > Art > > > > > > ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2000 22:16:18 +0200 From: Andreas Parsch Subject: OFF-TOPIC(?): RM-82/84/85/86 Hello all, in the late 50's/early 60's, the USAF used research missiles, designated XRM-82, XRM-84, XRM-85 and XRM-86, respectively. Does anyone know any details (manufacturer, names, specifications, etc.) about these vehicles? Any information is much appreciated :-)! .. and maybe one of the missile was from LMSC - then my question would at least be not _completely_ off topic ;-) Thanks Andreas - -- US Military Aviation Designation Systems http://www.andreas-parsch.online.de ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2000 16:48:20 -0700 From: "Terry W. Colvin" Subject: FWD (EXT/UASR) Re: Anti Zeppelin systems & Flying triangles in the sky At 05:58 PM 7/23/2000 -0400, you wrote: "Terry W. Colvin" wrote: > > "S.J. Van Sickle" wrote: > > > On Sun, 23 Jul 2000, John Clark wrote: > > > Actually I think ICBM's are an obsolete means of delivering a warhead, > > > it's like spending a lot of money on a anti Zeppelin system, except that > > > system would work. > > > > > > Zeppelin bombardment is only obsolete *because* of the development of > > > anti-Zeppelin systems (i.e. machine guns, AA guns, fixed wing aircraft). > > > The Air Force would *love* a bomber with the capacity and loiter ability > > > of a Zeppelin. > > > > > > steve > > > > Bingo. A "Stealth Blimp" is under development. > >A stealth blimp is not that hard to do if all of your bag and structure >is polymer based, all you have really to worry about are the engines, >which can be fitted in faceted housings. The problem with blimps is >speed. 120 mph is fast for a blimp, but of no use for a long range >plane, as its just too easy to spot visually, and shoot down. You could possibly go for a high altitude vehicle like this, it would be damn near radar transparent with only few modifications, and could be used for things like high altitude bombings (like the B-52s did in SE Asia), and at high enough altitudes would be invisible to the eye at night. could also double as a recon craft before or after the drop, due to it's increased loiter ability. Would definitely not be a ship you would want to be in if you were spotted though. Gryphin - -------------- Terry wrote (or rather, forwarded): >Although questioned by some, the Belgian 'Flying Triangle' wave of 1989 is >still highly revered in the canon of ufology. Oh good, Belgium is still on the UFO-map :-) >The "Black Triangle" sights have been documented for years now, all over >the world. Could such an advanced earthbound technology have existed >undisclosed for so long? There are plenty of suspects: HALO, the >Aurora, the TR3, the "Stealth Blimp:, but if this was a military test >flight, why risk exposure by flying brightly-lit aircraft over >well-populated areas? We'd be naive to expect answers any time soon. Well, that's what puzzled me at the time and it still does. If these aircraft were earthbound, it means that "they" (whoever they are) were testing these aircraft over Belgian airspace without authorisation (thus violating our airspace) Maybe the main idea was to get people used to them? Get Europeans to see them first since some European governments don't mind admitting that something ET could very well be out there and visit us? (Of course, if they were ET, it makes sense they visited Belgium first, we're known all over the Universe for our great chocolates :-) Still, I suspect those triangles not to be ET at all, but that's a personal impression. Handy for those conducting experiments to have everyone thinking their experimental craft are ET, that way they (whoever they are) don't have to answer questions, right? If the main powers on Earth didn't know whose craft they were, wouldn't there be a huge search for the things? Roundish UFOs have been seen for centuries, so governments world-wide probably classify any such reports as concerning ET craft (or imagination, or natural, mis-identified phenomena) but shouldn't they worry if unknown craft of entirely different shapes start showing up? They could be "the enemy" (whoever that is nowadays - is there one?) so if the governments are not investigating, it means they know darned well just whose craft they are. CU Lieve - -- Terry W. Colvin, Sierra Vista, Arizona (USA) < fortean1@frontiernet.net > Alternate: < terry_colvin@hotmail.com > Home Page: < http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Stargate/8958/index.html > Sites: Fortean Times * Northwest Mysteries * Mystic's Cyberpage * TLCB * U.S. Message Text Formatting (USMTF) Program - ------------ Member: Thailand-Laos-Cambodia Brotherhood (TLCB) Mailing List TLCB Web Site: < http://www.tlc-brotherhood.org >[Allies, CIA/NSA, and Vietnam veterans welcome] Southeast Asia (SEA) service: Vietnam - Theater Telecommunications Center/HHC, 1st Aviation Brigade (Jan 71 - Aug 72) Thailand/Laos - Telecommunications Center/U.S. Army Support Thailand (USARSUPTHAI), Camp Samae San (Jan 73 - Aug 73) - Special Security/Strategic Communications - Thailand (STRATCOM - Thailand), Phu Mu (Pig Mountain) Signal Site (Aug 73 - Jan 74) ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 18:42:56 -0700 From: Dan Zinngrabe Subject: Re: Panther Piss >Hey guys, > >You might track down a copy of my book on the B-2 and find the answer to your >"PP" in there. I don't have a copy handy, otherwise I'd provide the data on >acid injection/contrail formation, myself. Additionally, are you all aware of >the environmental menace that has appeared out of nowhere in the atmosphere >(in concert with the operational debut of the B-2)? There was a piece in >several of the local newspapers about a mysterious chemical combo that has >only recently been discovered...and that remains unexplained. There are >serious concerns about its impact on the environment. It's much more >insidious than ozone. > >Cheers, Jay Miller Yup, the Block 30 B-2 upgrade program contains an item labelled "contrail management system". You can see some mention of it here: GAO has a bunch of other B-2 related documents that mention the CMS, but nothing with much detail. Northrop has a patent on the LIDAR system used in the CMS, but I haven't found it yet on the IBM patents site. Dan _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ Have you exported RSA today? print pack"C*",split/\D+/,`echo "16iII*o\U@{$/=$z;[(pop,pop,unpack"H*",<> )]}\EsMsKsN0[lN*1lK[d2%Sa2/d0 Subject: News on the F-22 program - ----Original Message Follows---- From: webmaster@lmasc.com Reply-To: webmaster@lmasc.com To: news@lmasc.com Subject: News on the F-22 program Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 06:52:55 -0500 (CDT) Attached is a news update on the F-22 program. If you no longer wish to receive these updates, please contact webmaster@lmasc.com. F-22 completes milestone ahead of schedule EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE, Calif. (AFPN) (August 28, 2000) - The F-22 Raptor completed another major Defense Acquisition Board milestone approximately three weeks ahead of schedule, according to F-22 Combined Test Force officials here. The milestone, which required the F-22 to perform flight maneuvers at high angles of attack with its weapons bay doors open, was the third of nine flight test milestones completed this year, said Mike Cabiness, site manager, F-22 CTF, Edwards Air Force Base, Calif. The test, officially titled as "Initiate High AoA with Weapons Bay Doors Open," required the Raptor to fly with its center weapons bay doors open and conduct extensive maneuvering flight and with a high angle of attack, or nose up attitude, Cabiness said. "The purpose was to evaluate the weapons bay doors ability to withstand significant changes in pressure gradients generated by the airflow as it passes by the plane's fuselage," he explained. According to test engineers at the F-22 testing facility, the aircraft passed its milestone "with flying colors." F-22 test pilot Jon Beesley, who flew Raptor 4002 during the test, concurs. "The F-22 was very predictable while flying at low air speeds at such a high angle of attack," he said. "If any problems existed [with the design of the weapons bay doors], flying at such a profile should have aggravated them however, there was no noticeable difference from normal flight. "This airplane does what pilots want it to do, when they want to do it," Beesley said. "The engineers have worked hard to make the aircraft fly well and they have succeeded. What is even more impressive is that it can fly at such a high angle of attack and still remain a stealthy aircraft." The specific maneuvers done by Beesley included 360-degree rolls and full-pedal slipslides, where the pedals, or rudder controls, are pushed to the full extent of their control travel, CTF officials said. The tests were accomplished at 35,000 feet and at varying airspeeds. While the specific details of the test profile remain sensitive, the aircraft's performance continued to exceed capabilities of all other fighter aircraft currently in use. "The Raptor was able to easily fly at an AoA that would cause any other aircraft to depart from controlled flight into a stall or spin," Beesley said. The "F-22 continues to perform outstandingly in all tests and it remains unsurpassed in both its handling and flight performance," he said. "It is easily the most maneuverable fighter ever built." Edwards is currently testing three F-22s. Since the start of testing, a little over two years ago, the F-22 program has flown over 690 hours and completed over 8,000 flight test points, or evaluation items, and over 2,500 maintenance or logistics test points. The F-22 test team has completed several major flight test milestones, and all have been accomplished ahead of schedule, Cabiness said. "As an example of applied aerodynamics in action, the F-22 test program remains, based on historical data, the single most efficient flight-test program in Edwards' history," he said. "The test team has seen continued successes in its ability to fine tune Raptor performance, expand the aircraft's flight envelope and discover areas to enhance structural capabilities." "All flight test tasks are essential to helping the F-22 reach its ultimate goal of being "the air superiority fighter" of the 21st Century," he said. The other milestones completed this year include the first flight of Raptor 4003 and AIM-9 separation testing. Completion of Raptor 4004, 4005, 4006 and the avionics testing milestones can begin once the items complete the manufacturing process and are ready for issue to the combined test force. Completion of test points that will culminate with separation testing of the AIM-120 and RCS testing are proceeding satisfactorily. Contact: Greg Caires greg.a.caires@lmco.com _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2000 15:19:07 GMT From: "wayne binkley" Subject: Yahoo! News Story - Two Die in France Plane Crash This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_c38_3402_74b5 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed From: Yahoo! News Reply-To: wbinkley@hotmail.com Subject: Yahoo! News Story - Two Die in France Plane Crash _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. - ------=_NextPart_000_c38_3402_74b5 Content-Type: message/rfc822 >From p4.news@yahoo.com Thu Sep 07 08:08:26 2000 Received: from [204.71.201.112] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBB80F9DB007AD82197A0CC47C9700D1C0; Thu Sep 07 08:06:03 2000 From: Yahoo! News To: wbinkley@hotmail.com Cc: Reply-to: wbinkley@hotmail.com Subject: Yahoo! News Story - Two Die in France Plane Crash Return-path: refertofriend-error@reply.yahoo.com Errors-To: refertofriend-error@reply.yahoo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html wayne (wbinkley@hotmail.com) has sent you a news article

Personal message:

Two Die in France Plane Crash
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ap/20000906/wl/france_crash_2.html


Two Die in France Plane Crash
Yahoo! News Home - Yahoo! - My Yahoo! - News Alerts - Help

Associated Press

Home  Top Stories  Business  Tech  Politics   World   Local  Entertainment  Sports  Science  Health  Full Coverage
World News - updated 10:55 AM ET Sep 7
My Add to My Yahoo!
Reuters  |  AP  |  Photos  |  Canada  |  Asia  |  UK & Ireland   | More ...

 Speak your mind
Discuss this story with other people.
[Start a Conversation]

(Requires Yahoo! Messenger)

Wednesday September 6 8:27 AM ET
Two Die in France Plane Crash Two Die in France Plane Crash

AP Photo
AP Photo

GRENOBLE, France (AP) - A cargo plane with three Americans aboard crashed Wednesday while it was dumping water over a forest fire in southeastern France, killing two people, officials said.

Two surviving crew members were seriously injured when the C-130 Hercules crashed into a hill near the small town of Burzet as it was releasing water over the flames. The plane was owned by a private company and rented by local authorities.

The crew consisted of three Americans and a Frenchman living in the United States. It was unclear which crew members were killed, and authorities said they would not identify them until their families had been notified.

Rescuers raced to the scene, which was difficult to reach because of the craggy terrain.

The overnight fire destroyed about 100 acres of forest but was under control by Wednesday morning. The cause of the fire was under investigation.

Email this story - (View most popular)  |  Printer-friendly format

Earlier Stories
Two Dead in France Plane Crash (September 6)

Archived Stories by Date:


Search News
Advanced
Search:  Stories   Photos   Full Coverage
Home  Top Stories  Business  Tech  Politics   World   Local  Entertainment  Sports  Science  Health  Full Coverage


Copyright © 2000 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
The information contained in the AP News report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press.
Questions or Comments
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service
- ------=_NextPart_000_c38_3402_74b5-- ------------------------------ End of skunk-works-digest V9 #68 ******************************** To subscribe to skunk-works-digest, send the command: subscribe in the body of a message to "majordomo@netwrx1.com". If you want to subscribe something other than the account the mail is coming from, such as a local redistribution list, then append that address to the "subscribe" command; for example, to subscribe "local-skunk-works": subscribe local-skunk-works@your.domain.net To unsubscribe, send mail to the same address, with the command: unsubscribe in the body. Administrative requests, problems, and other non-list mail can be sent to georgek@netwrx1.com. A non-digest (direct mail) version of this list is also available; to subscribe to that instead, replace all instances of "skunk-works-digest" in the commands above with "skunk-works". Back issues are available for viewing by a www interface located at: http://www.netwrx1.com/skunk-works/ If you have any questions or problems please contact me at: georgek@netwrx1.com Thanks, George R. Kasica Listowner