From skunk-works@netwrx1.org Wed Sep 25 01:24:09 2013 Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 01:24:02 From: skunk-works Subject: skunk-works Message Digest for 09/25/2013 Here is your digest of messages for skunk-works. From: Karen Mass Subject: Message Digest for 09/24/2013 Date: 09-24-2013 On 9/24/2013 1:04 AM, skunk-works wrote: > Here is your digest of messages for skunk-works. > > > > From: Karen Mass > Subject: Re: Message Digest for 09/23/2013 > Date: 09-23-2013 > > On 9/23/2013 12:28 AM, skunk-works wrote: >> Here is your digest of messages for skunk-works. >> >> >> >> From: "hilltop40@earthlink.net" >> Subject: Re: [] Your email requires verificationverify#zWSz37hMbInpT22hGDdVp-1379491387) >> Date: 09-22-2013 >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >>> From: john@blackbirds.net, skunk-works@netwrx1.org >>> Sent: Sep 18, 2013 1:11 AM >>> To: hilltop40@earthlink.net >>> Subject: [skunk-works] Your email requires verification verify#zWSz37hMbInpT22hGDdVp-1379491387) >>> >>> The message you sent requires that you verify that you >>> are a real live human being and not a spam source. >>> >>> >>> To complete this verification, simply reply to this message and leave >>> the subject line intact or click the link below: >>> >>> http://www.blackbirds.net/cgi-sys/bxd.cgi?a=john@blackbirds.net&id=zWSz37hMbInpT22hGDdVp-1379491387 >>> >>> The headers of the message sent from your address are shown below: >>> >> >From skunk-works@netwrx1.org Wed Sep 18 01:03:07 2013 >>> Received: from apollo.netwrx1.com ([108.76.168.147]:2973 helo=saturn.netwrx1.org) >>> by dagobah.betteresolution.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) >>> (envelope-from ) >>> id 1VMCj4-0004Ot-2M >>> for john@blackbirds.net; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 01:03:07 -0700 >>> Received: from APOLLO ([127.0.0.1]) by netwrx1.org with MailEnable ESMTP; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 03:03:02 -0500 >>> To: john@blackbirds.net >>> From: JW Kenney >>> Subject: [skunk-works] 18Sept - Re: Message Digest for 09/18/2013 >>> Reply-To: skunk-works@netwrx1.org >>> X-Mailer: GroupMAN Listserver1.8 Build 2199 >>> Comments: Discussion List Software at http://groupman.tnlsoft.com >>> Errors-To: gkasica@netwrx1.com >>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable >>> Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 >>> MIME-Version: 1.0 >>> Message-ID: <60ce6ce60303e307dd@[108.76.168.147]> >>> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 03:03:02 -0500 >>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 >>> X-Spam-Score: 7 >>> X-Spam-Bar: / >>> X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "dagobah.betteresolution.net", has >>> identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message >>> has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label >>> similar future email. If you have any questions, see >>> root\@localhost for details. >>> >>> Content preview: NOTHNING was sent with email to us. Jack Kenney [...] >>> >>> Content analysis details: (0.7 points, 5.0 required) >>> >>> pts rule name description >>> ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- >>> -0.0 BAYES_40 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 20 to 40% >>> [score: 0.2550] >>> 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message >>> 0.0 HTML_FONT_SIZE_LARGE BODY: HTML font size is large >>> 0.7 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts >>> X-Spam-Flag: NO >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------- >> From: john@blackbirds.net >> Subject: Re: Re: [] Your email requires verification >> Date: 09-22-2013 >> >> This message is a reply to a boxtrapper verification message. >> >> No action is needed on your part. >> >> If you were expecting to be added to the users whitelist please ensure that >> the verification email you responded to contained the correct verify string >> in the subject. Boxtrapper saw the verification key as "zWSz37hMbInpT22hGDdVp-1379491387". >> >> The headers of the message sent from your address are shown below: >> >> >From skunk-works@netwrx1.org Sun Sep 22 10:18:47 2013 >> Received: from apollo.netwrx1.com ([108.76.168.147]:1869 helo=saturn.netwrx1.org) >> by dagobah.betteresolution.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) >> (envelope-from ) >> id 1VNnJ0-0002Ra-4Y >> for john@blackbirds.net; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 10:18:47 -0700 >> Received: from APOLLO ([127.0.0.1]) by netwrx1.org with MailEnable ESMTP; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:18:43 -0500 >> To: john@blackbirds.net >> From: "hilltop40@earthlink.net" >> Subject: skunk-works Re: [] Your email requires verificationverify#zWSz37hMbInpT22hGDdVp-1379491387) >> Reply-To: skunk-works@netwrx1.org >> X-Mailer: GroupMAN Listserver1.8 Build 2199 >> Comments: Discussion List Software at http://groupman.tnlsoft.com >> Errors-To: gkasica@netwrx1.com >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >> MIME-Version: 1.0 >> Message-ID: <77649b890003e807dd@[108.76.168.147]> >> Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:18:43 -0500 >> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 >> X-Spam-Score: -18 >> X-Spam-Bar: - >> X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "dagobah.betteresolution.net", has >> identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message >> has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label >> similar future email. If you have any questions, see >> root\@localhost for details. >> >> Content preview: >> >> Content analysis details: (-1.9 points, 5.0 required) >> >> pts rule name description >> ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- >> -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% >> [score: 0.0000] >> X-Spam-Flag: NO >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------- >> From: "hilltop40@earthlink.net" >> Subject: Re: [] Your email requires verificationverify#MWy8nk505i7ELAuFwij9h-1379511407) >> Date: 09-22-2013 >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >>> From: john@blackbirds.net >>> Sent: Sep 18, 2013 6:47 AM >>> To: hilltop40@earthlink.net >>> Subject: [skunk-works] Your email requires verification verify#MWy8nk505i7ELAuFwij9h-1379511407) >>> >>> The message you sent requires that you verify that you >>> are a real live human being and not a spam source. >>> >>> >>> To complete this verification, simply reply to this message and leave >>> the subject line intact or click the link below: >>> >>> http://www.blackbirds.net/cgi-sys/bxd.cgi?a=john@blackbirds.net&id=MWy8nk505i7ELAuFwij9h-1379511407 >>> >>> The headers of the message sent from your address are shown below: >>> >> >From miltech.fms@gmail.com Wed Sep 18 06:36:47 2013 >>> Received: from apollo.netwrx1.com ([108.76.168.147]:2293 helo=saturn.netwrx1.org) >>> by dagobah.betteresolution.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) >>> (envelope-from ) >>> id 1VMHvy-0005J4-BF >>> for john@blackbirds.net; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 06:36:47 -0700 >>> Received: from APOLLO ([127.0.0.1]) by netwrx1.org with MailEnable ESMTP; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 08:36:43 -0500 >>> To: john@blackbirds.net >>> From: "miltech.fms" >>> Subject: [skunk-works] Re: RE: Re: Message Digest for 09/18/2013 >>> Reply-To: skunk-works@netwrx1.org >>> X-Mailer: GroupMAN Listserver1.8 Build 2199 >>> Comments: Discussion List Software at http://groupman.tnlsoft.com >>> Errors-To: gkasica@netwrx1.com >>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable >>> Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 >>> MIME-Version: 1.0 >>> Message-ID: <61ffea430304c207dd@[108.76.168.147]> >>> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 08:36:43 -0500 >>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 >>> X-Spam-Score: 8 >>> X-Spam-Bar: / >>> X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "dagobah.betteresolution.net", has >>> identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message >>> has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label >>> similar future email. If you have any questions, see >>> root\@localhost for details. >>> >>> Content preview: On 18 September 2013 22:26, George Kasica >>> wrote: Here's the info again: Moving the Skunk-woks and skunk-works digest >>> is complete. [...] >>> >>> Content analysis details: (0.8 points, 5.0 required) >>> >>> pts rule name description >>> ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- >>> 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider >>> (miltech.fms[at]gmail.com) >>> 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is >>> CUSTOM_MED >>> 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) >>> -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% >>> [score: 0.0000] >>> 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message >>> 0.7 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts >>> 0.4 HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG HTML-only message, but there is no HTML tag >>> 0.9 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED ADSP custom_med hit, and not from a mailing list >>> X-Spam-Flag: NO >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------- >> From: "hilltop40@earthlink.net" >> Subject: Re: [] Your email requires verificationverify#MWy8nk505i7ELAuFwij9h-1379511407) >> Date: 09-22-2013 >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >>> From: john@blackbirds.net >>> Sent: Sep 18, 2013 6:47 AM >>> To: hilltop40@earthlink.net >>> Subject: [skunk-works] Your email requires verification verify#MWy8nk505i7ELAuFwij9h-1379511407) >>> >>> The message you sent requires that you verify that you >>> are a real live human being and not a spam source. >>> >>> >>> To complete this verification, simply reply to this message and leave >>> the subject line intact or click the link below: >>> >>> http://www.blackbirds.net/cgi-sys/bxd.cgi?a=john@blackbirds.net&id=MWy8nk505i7ELAuFwij9h-1379511407 >>> >>> The headers of the message sent from your address are shown below: >>> >> >From miltech.fms@gmail.com Wed Sep 18 06:36:47 2013 >>> Received: from apollo.netwrx1.com ([108.76.168.147]:2293 helo=saturn.netwrx1.org) >>> by dagobah.betteresolution.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) >>> (envelope-from ) >>> id 1VMHvy-0005J4-BF >>> for john@blackbirds.net; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 06:36:47 -0700 >>> Received: from APOLLO ([127.0.0.1]) by netwrx1.org with MailEnable ESMTP; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 08:36:43 -0500 >>> To: john@blackbirds.net >>> From: "miltech.fms" >>> Subject: [skunk-works] Re: RE: Re: Message Digest for 09/18/2013 >>> Reply-To: skunk-works@netwrx1.org >>> X-Mailer: GroupMAN Listserver1.8 Build 2199 >>> Comments: Discussion List Software at http://groupman.tnlsoft.com >>> Errors-To: gkasica@netwrx1.com >>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable >>> Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 >>> MIME-Version: 1.0 >>> Message-ID: <61ffea430304c207dd@[108.76.168.147]> >>> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 08:36:43 -0500 >>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 >>> X-Spam-Score: 8 >>> X-Spam-Bar: / >>> X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "dagobah.betteresolution.net", has >>> identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message >>> has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label >>> similar future email. If you have any questions, see >>> root\@localhost for details. >>> >>> Content preview: On 18 September 2013 22:26, George Kasica >>> wrote: Here's the info again: Moving the Skunk-woks and skunk-works digest >>> is complete. [...] >>> >>> Content analysis details: (0.8 points, 5.0 required) >>> >>> pts rule name description >>> ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- >>> 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider >>> (miltech.fms[at]gmail.com) >>> 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is >>> CUSTOM_MED >>> 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) >>> -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% >>> [score: 0.0000] >>> 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message >>> 0.7 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts >>> 0.4 HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG HTML-only message, but there is no HTML tag >>> 0.9 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED ADSP custom_med hit, and not from a mailing list >>> X-Spam-Flag: NO >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------- >> From: john@blackbirds.net >> Subject: Re: Re: [] Your email requires verification >> Date: 09-22-2013 >> >> This message is a reply to a boxtrapper verification message. >> >> No action is needed on your part. >> >> If you were expecting to be added to the users whitelist please ensure that >> the verification email you responded to contained the correct verify string >> in the subject. Boxtrapper saw the verification key as "MWy8nk505i7ELAuFwij9h-1379511407". >> >> The headers of the message sent from your address are shown below: >> >> >From skunk-works@netwrx1.org Sun Sep 22 10:23:22 2013 >> Received: from apollo.netwrx1.com ([108.76.168.147]:2117 helo=saturn.netwrx1.org) >> by dagobah.betteresolution.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) >> (envelope-from ) >> id 1VNnNR-0002gP-KU >> for john@blackbirds.net; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 10:23:22 -0700 >> Received: from APOLLO ([127.0.0.1]) by netwrx1.org with MailEnable ESMTP; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:23:21 -0500 >> To: john@blackbirds.net >> From: "hilltop40@earthlink.net" >> Subject: skunk-works Re: [] Your email requires verificationverify#MWy8nk505i7ELAuFwij9h-1379511407) >> Reply-To: skunk-works@netwrx1.org >> X-Mailer: GroupMAN Listserver1.8 Build 2199 >> Comments: Discussion List Software at http://groupman.tnlsoft.com >> Errors-To: gkasica@netwrx1.com >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >> MIME-Version: 1.0 >> Message-ID: <7768d71600043e07dd@[108.76.168.147]> >> Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:23:20 -0500 >> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 >> X-Spam-Score: -18 >> X-Spam-Bar: - >> X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "dagobah.betteresolution.net", has >> identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message >> has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label >> similar future email. If you have any questions, see >> root\@localhost for details. >> >> Content preview: >> >> Content analysis details: (-1.9 points, 5.0 required) >> >> pts rule name description >> ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- >> -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% >> [score: 0.0000] >> X-Spam-Flag: NO >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------- >> From: john@blackbirds.net >> Subject: Re: Re: [] Your email requires verification >> Date: 09-22-2013 >> >> This message is a reply to a boxtrapper verification message. >> >> No action is needed on your part. >> >> If you were expecting to be added to the users whitelist please ensure that >> the verification email you responded to contained the correct verify string >> in the subject. Boxtrapper saw the verification key as "MWy8nk505i7ELAuFwij9h-1379511407". >> >> The headers of the message sent from your address are shown below: >> >> >From skunk-works@netwrx1.org Sun Sep 22 10:25:02 2013 >> Received: from apollo.netwrx1.com ([108.76.168.147]:2234 helo=saturn.netwrx1.org) >> by dagobah.betteresolution.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) >> (envelope-from ) >> id 1VNnP3-0002hy-MW >> for john@blackbirds.net; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 10:25:02 -0700 >> Received: from APOLLO ([127.0.0.1]) by netwrx1.org with MailEnable ESMTP; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:25:00 -0500 >> To: john@blackbirds.net >> From: "hilltop40@earthlink.net" >> Subject: skunk-works Re: [] Your email requires verificationverify#MWy8nk505i7ELAuFwij9h-1379511407) >> Reply-To: skunk-works@netwrx1.org >> X-Mailer: GroupMAN Listserver1.8 Build 2199 >> Comments: Discussion List Software at http://groupman.tnlsoft.com >> Errors-To: gkasica@netwrx1.com >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >> MIME-Version: 1.0 >> Message-ID: <776a5a1c0003ab07dd@[108.76.168.147]> >> Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:25:00 -0500 >> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 >> X-Spam-Score: -18 >> X-Spam-Bar: - >> X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "dagobah.betteresolution.net", has >> identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message >> has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label >> similar future email. If you have any questions, see >> root\@localhost for details. >> >> Content preview: >> >> Content analysis details: (-1.9 points, 5.0 required) >> >> pts rule name description >> ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- >> -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% >> [score: 0.0000] >> X-Spam-Flag: NO >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------- >> From: "hilltop40@earthlink.net" >> Subject: Re: [] Your email requires verificationverify#BPoTgiVEUCF_IVVCL2FIO-1379515742) >> Date: 09-22-2013 >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >>> From: john@blackbirds.net >>> Sent: Sep 18, 2013 7:52 AM >>> To: hilltop40@earthlink.net >>> Subject: [skunk-works] Your email requires verification verify#BPoTgiVEUCF_IVVCL2FIO-1379515742) >>> >>> The message you sent requires that you verify that you >>> are a real live human being and not a spam source. >>> >>> >>> To complete this verification, simply reply to this message and leave >>> the subject line intact or click the link below: >>> >>> http://www.blackbirds.net/cgi-sys/bxd.cgi?a=john@blackbirds.net&id=BPoTgiVEUCF_IVVCL2FIO-1379515742 >>> >>> The headers of the message sent from your address are shown below: >>> >> >From markr@signal100.com Wed Sep 18 07:49:02 2013 >>> Received: from apollo.netwrx1.com ([108.76.168.147]:1632 helo=saturn.netwrx1.org) >>> by dagobah.betteresolution.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) >>> (envelope-from ) >>> id 1VMJ3t-0001uW-CL >>> for john@blackbirds.net; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 07:49:02 -0700 >>> Received: from APOLLO ([127.0.0.1]) by netwrx1.org with MailEnable ESMTP; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 09:48:59 -0500 >>> To: john@blackbirds.net >>> From: Mark Rousell >>> Subject: [skunk-works] Re: New Skunk Works Commands >>> Reply-To: skunk-works@netwrx1.org >>> X-Mailer: GroupMAN Listserver1.8 Build 2199 >>> Comments: Discussion List Software at http://groupman.tnlsoft.com >>> Errors-To: gkasica@netwrx1.com >>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >>> MIME-Version: 1.0 >>> Message-ID: <6242169003042f07dd@[108.76.168.147]> >>> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 09:48:59 -0500 >>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 >>> X-Spam-Score: -18 >>> X-Spam-Bar: - >>> X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "dagobah.betteresolution.net", has >>> identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message >>> has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label >>> similar future email. If you have any questions, see >>> root\@localhost for details. >>> >>> Content preview: On 18/09/2013 14:35, George Kasica wrote: > Let me look into >>> the digest issue here. Given the low traffic I'm not sure > it makes sense >>> to even have a digest mode at this point. I only signed up to the digest >>> version of the list (several years ago now) in addition to the normal list >>> because I realised that, at that time, not all posts were reaching me via >>> the normal list. By being a member of both I could be reasonably sure I was >>> getting everything one way or another. I never did figure out where/why the >>> posts were going astray. [...] >>> >>> Content analysis details: (-1.9 points, 5.0 required) >>> >>> pts rule name description >>> ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- >>> -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% >>> [score: 0.0000] >>> X-Spam-Flag: NO >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------- >> From: john@blackbirds.net >> Subject: Re: Re: [] Your email requires verification >> Date: 09-22-2013 >> >> This message is a reply to a boxtrapper verification message. >> >> No action is needed on your part. >> >> If you were expecting to be added to the users whitelist please ensure that >> the verification email you responded to contained the correct verify string >> in the subject. Boxtrapper saw the verification key as "BPoTgiVEUCF_IVVCL2FIO-1379515742". >> >> The headers of the message sent from your address are shown below: >> >> >From skunk-works@netwrx1.org Sun Sep 22 10:27:38 2013 >> Received: from apollo.netwrx1.com ([108.76.168.147]:2537 helo=saturn.netwrx1.org) >> by dagobah.betteresolution.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) >> (envelope-from ) >> id 1VNnRZ-0002tU-HR >> for john@blackbirds.net; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 10:27:38 -0700 >> Received: from APOLLO ([127.0.0.1]) by netwrx1.org with MailEnable ESMTP; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:27:37 -0500 >> To: john@blackbirds.net >> From: "hilltop40@earthlink.net" >> Subject: skunk-works Re: [] Your email requires verificationverify#BPoTgiVEUCF_IVVCL2FIO-1379515742) >> Reply-To: skunk-works@netwrx1.org >> X-Mailer: GroupMAN Listserver1.8 Build 2199 >> Comments: Discussion List Software at http://groupman.tnlsoft.com >> Errors-To: gkasica@netwrx1.com >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >> MIME-Version: 1.0 >> Message-ID: <776cc09c00042707dd@[108.76.168.147]> >> Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:27:37 -0500 >> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 >> X-Spam-Score: -18 >> X-Spam-Bar: - >> X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "dagobah.betteresolution.net", has >> identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message >> has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label >> similar future email. If you have any questions, see >> root\@localhost for details. >> >> Content preview: >> >> Content analysis details: (-1.9 points, 5.0 required) >> >> pts rule name description >> ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- >> -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% >> [score: 0.0000] >> X-Spam-Flag: NO >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> >> > i'm really here, alive and breathing! > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > From: > Subject: RE: Message Digest for 09/23/2013 > Date: 09-23-2013 > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: skunk-works [mailto:skunk-works@netwrx1.org] > Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 12:28 AM > To: Wallace, Adrian T > Subject: skunk-works Message Digest for 09/23/2013 > > Here is your digest of messages for skunk-works. > > > > From: "hilltop40@earthlink.net" > Subject: Re: [] Your email requires verificationverify#zWSz37hMbInpT22hGDdVp-1379491387) > Date: 09-22-2013 > > > > > -----Original Message----- >> From: john@blackbirds.net, skunk-works@netwrx1.org >> Sent: Sep 18, 2013 1:11 AM >> To: hilltop40@earthlink.net >> Subject: [skunk-works] Your email requires verification >> verify#zWSz37hMbInpT22hGDdVp-1379491387) >> >> The message you sent requires that you verify that you are a real live >> human being and not a spam source. >> >> >> To complete this verification, simply reply to this message and leave >> the subject line intact or click the link below: >> >> http://www.blackbirds.net/cgi-sys/bxd.cgi?a=john@blackbirds.net&id=zWSz >> 37hMbInpT22hGDdVp-1379491387 >> >> The headers of the message sent from your address are shown below: >> > >From skunk-works@netwrx1.org Wed Sep 18 01:03:07 2013 >> Received: from apollo.netwrx1.com ([108.76.168.147]:2973 helo=saturn.netwrx1.org) >> by dagobah.betteresolution.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) >> (envelope-from ) >> id 1VMCj4-0004Ot-2M >> for john@blackbirds.net; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 01:03:07 -0700 >> Received: from APOLLO ([127.0.0.1]) by netwrx1.org with MailEnable >> ESMTP; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 03:03:02 -0500 >> To: john@blackbirds.net >> From: JW Kenney >> Subject: [skunk-works] 18Sept - Re: Message Digest for 09/18/2013 >> Reply-To: skunk-works@netwrx1.org >> X-Mailer: GroupMAN Listserver1.8 Build 2199 >> Comments: Discussion List Software at http://groupman.tnlsoft.com >> Errors-To: gkasica@netwrx1.com >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable >> Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 >> MIME-Version: 1.0 >> Message-ID: <60ce6ce60303e307dd@[108.76.168.147]> >> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 03:03:02 -0500 >> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 >> X-Spam-Score: 7 >> X-Spam-Bar: / >> X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system >> "dagobah.betteresolution.net", has identified this incoming email as >> possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you >> can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you >> have any questions, see root\@localhost for details. >> >> Content preview: NOTHNING was sent with email to us. Jack Kenney >> [...] >> >> Content analysis details: (0.7 points, 5.0 required) >> >> pts rule name description >> ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- >> -0.0 BAYES_40 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 20 to 40% >> [score: 0.2550] >> 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message >> 0.0 HTML_FONT_SIZE_LARGE BODY: HTML font size is large >> 0.7 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts >> X-Spam-Flag: NO >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > From: john@blackbirds.net > Subject: Re: Re: [] Your email requires verification > Date: 09-22-2013 > > This message is a reply to a boxtrapper verification message. > > No action is needed on your part. > > If you were expecting to be added to the users whitelist please ensure that the verification email you responded to contained the correct verify string in the subject. Boxtrapper saw the verification key as "zWSz37hMbInpT22hGDdVp-1379491387". > > The headers of the message sent from your address are shown below: > > >From skunk-works@netwrx1.org Sun Sep 22 10:18:47 2013 > Received: from apollo.netwrx1.com ([108.76.168.147]:1869 helo=saturn.netwrx1.org) > by dagobah.betteresolution.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) > (envelope-from ) > id 1VNnJ0-0002Ra-4Y > for john@blackbirds.net; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 10:18:47 -0700 > Received: from APOLLO ([127.0.0.1]) by netwrx1.org with MailEnable ESMTP; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:18:43 -0500 > To: john@blackbirds.net > From: "hilltop40@earthlink.net" > Subject: skunk-works Re: [] Your email requires verificationverify#zWSz37hMbInpT22hGDdVp-1379491387) > Reply-To: skunk-works@netwrx1.org > X-Mailer: GroupMAN Listserver1.8 Build 2199 > Comments: Discussion List Software at http://groupman.tnlsoft.com > Errors-To: gkasica@netwrx1.com > Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Message-ID: <77649b890003e807dd@[108.76.168.147]> > Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:18:43 -0500 > X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 > X-Spam-Score: -18 > X-Spam-Bar: - > X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "dagobah.betteresolution.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see root\@localhost for details. > > Content preview: > > Content analysis details: (-1.9 points, 5.0 required) > > pts rule name description > ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- > -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% > [score: 0.0000] > X-Spam-Flag: NO > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > From: "hilltop40@earthlink.net" > Subject: Re: [] Your email requires verificationverify#MWy8nk505i7ELAuFwij9h-1379511407) > Date: 09-22-2013 > > > > > -----Original Message----- >> From: john@blackbirds.net >> Sent: Sep 18, 2013 6:47 AM >> To: hilltop40@earthlink.net >> Subject: [skunk-works] Your email requires verification >> verify#MWy8nk505i7ELAuFwij9h-1379511407) >> >> The message you sent requires that you verify that you are a real live >> human being and not a spam source. >> >> >> To complete this verification, simply reply to this message and leave >> the subject line intact or click the link below: >> >> http://www.blackbirds.net/cgi-sys/bxd.cgi?a=john@blackbirds.net&id=MWy8 >> nk505i7ELAuFwij9h-1379511407 >> >> The headers of the message sent from your address are shown below: >> > >From miltech.fms@gmail.com Wed Sep 18 06:36:47 2013 >> Received: from apollo.netwrx1.com ([108.76.168.147]:2293 helo=saturn.netwrx1.org) >> by dagobah.betteresolution.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) >> (envelope-from ) >> id 1VMHvy-0005J4-BF >> for john@blackbirds.net; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 06:36:47 -0700 >> Received: from APOLLO ([127.0.0.1]) by netwrx1.org with MailEnable >> ESMTP; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 08:36:43 -0500 >> To: john@blackbirds.net >> From: "miltech.fms" >> Subject: [skunk-works] Re: RE: Re: Message Digest for 09/18/2013 >> Reply-To: skunk-works@netwrx1.org >> X-Mailer: GroupMAN Listserver1.8 Build 2199 >> Comments: Discussion List Software at http://groupman.tnlsoft.com >> Errors-To: gkasica@netwrx1.com >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable >> Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 >> MIME-Version: 1.0 >> Message-ID: <61ffea430304c207dd@[108.76.168.147]> >> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 08:36:43 -0500 >> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 >> X-Spam-Score: 8 >> X-Spam-Bar: / >> X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system >> "dagobah.betteresolution.net", has identified this incoming email as >> possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you >> can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you >> have any questions, see root\@localhost for details. >> >> Content preview: On 18 September 2013 22:26, George Kasica >> wrote: Here's the info again: Moving the Skunk-woks and skunk-works digest >> is complete. [...] >> >> Content analysis details: (0.8 points, 5.0 required) >> >> pts rule name description >> ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- >> 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider >> (miltech.fms[at]gmail.com) >> 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is >> CUSTOM_MED >> 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) >> -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% >> [score: 0.0000] >> 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message >> 0.7 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts >> 0.4 HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG HTML-only message, but there is no HTML tag >> 0.9 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED ADSP custom_med hit, and not from a mailing list >> X-Spam-Flag: NO >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > From: "hilltop40@earthlink.net" > Subject: Re: [] Your email requires verificationverify#MWy8nk505i7ELAuFwij9h-1379511407) > Date: 09-22-2013 > > > > > -----Original Message----- >> From: john@blackbirds.net >> Sent: Sep 18, 2013 6:47 AM >> To: hilltop40@earthlink.net >> Subject: [skunk-works] Your email requires verification >> verify#MWy8nk505i7ELAuFwij9h-1379511407) >> >> The message you sent requires that you verify that you are a real live >> human being and not a spam source. >> >> >> To complete this verification, simply reply to this message and leave >> the subject line intact or click the link below: >> >> http://www.blackbirds.net/cgi-sys/bxd.cgi?a=john@blackbirds.net&id=MWy8 >> nk505i7ELAuFwij9h-1379511407 >> >> The headers of the message sent from your address are shown below: >> > >From miltech.fms@gmail.com Wed Sep 18 06:36:47 2013 >> Received: from apollo.netwrx1.com ([108.76.168.147]:2293 helo=saturn.netwrx1.org) >> by dagobah.betteresolution.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) >> (envelope-from ) >> id 1VMHvy-0005J4-BF >> for john@blackbirds.net; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 06:36:47 -0700 >> Received: from APOLLO ([127.0.0.1]) by netwrx1.org with MailEnable >> ESMTP; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 08:36:43 -0500 >> To: john@blackbirds.net >> From: "miltech.fms" >> Subject: [skunk-works] Re: RE: Re: Message Digest for 09/18/2013 >> Reply-To: skunk-works@netwrx1.org >> X-Mailer: GroupMAN Listserver1.8 Build 2199 >> Comments: Discussion List Software at http://groupman.tnlsoft.com >> Errors-To: gkasica@netwrx1.com >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable >> Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 >> MIME-Version: 1.0 >> Message-ID: <61ffea430304c207dd@[108.76.168.147]> >> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 08:36:43 -0500 >> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 >> X-Spam-Score: 8 >> X-Spam-Bar: / >> X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system >> "dagobah.betteresolution.net", has identified this incoming email as >> possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you >> can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you >> have any questions, see root\@localhost for details. >> >> Content preview: On 18 September 2013 22:26, George Kasica >> wrote: Here's the info again: Moving the Skunk-woks and skunk-works digest >> is complete. [...] >> >> Content analysis details: (0.8 points, 5.0 required) >> >> pts rule name description >> ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- >> 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider >> (miltech.fms[at]gmail.com) >> 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is >> CUSTOM_MED >> 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) >> -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% >> [score: 0.0000] >> 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message >> 0.7 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts >> 0.4 HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG HTML-only message, but there is no HTML tag >> 0.9 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED ADSP custom_med hit, and not from a mailing list >> X-Spam-Flag: NO >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > From: john@blackbirds.net > Subject: Re: Re: [] Your email requires verification > Date: 09-22-2013 > > This message is a reply to a boxtrapper verification message. > > No action is needed on your part. > > If you were expecting to be added to the users whitelist please ensure that the verification email you responded to contained the correct verify string in the subject. Boxtrapper saw the verification key as "MWy8nk505i7ELAuFwij9h-1379511407". > > The headers of the message sent from your address are shown below: > > >From skunk-works@netwrx1.org Sun Sep 22 10:23:22 2013 > Received: from apollo.netwrx1.com ([108.76.168.147]:2117 helo=saturn.netwrx1.org) > by dagobah.betteresolution.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) > (envelope-from ) > id 1VNnNR-0002gP-KU > for john@blackbirds.net; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 10:23:22 -0700 > Received: from APOLLO ([127.0.0.1]) by netwrx1.org with MailEnable ESMTP; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:23:21 -0500 > To: john@blackbirds.net > From: "hilltop40@earthlink.net" > Subject: skunk-works Re: [] Your email requires verificationverify#MWy8nk505i7ELAuFwij9h-1379511407) > Reply-To: skunk-works@netwrx1.org > X-Mailer: GroupMAN Listserver1.8 Build 2199 > Comments: Discussion List Software at http://groupman.tnlsoft.com > Errors-To: gkasica@netwrx1.com > Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Message-ID: <7768d71600043e07dd@[108.76.168.147]> > Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:23:20 -0500 > X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 > X-Spam-Score: -18 > X-Spam-Bar: - > X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "dagobah.betteresolution.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see root\@localhost for details. > > Content preview: > > Content analysis details: (-1.9 points, 5.0 required) > > pts rule name description > ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- > -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% > [score: 0.0000] > X-Spam-Flag: NO > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > From: john@blackbirds.net > Subject: Re: Re: [] Your email requires verification > Date: 09-22-2013 > > This message is a reply to a boxtrapper verification message. > > No action is needed on your part. > > If you were expecting to be added to the users whitelist please ensure that the verification email you responded to contained the correct verify string in the subject. Boxtrapper saw the verification key as "MWy8nk505i7ELAuFwij9h-1379511407". > > The headers of the message sent from your address are shown below: > > >From skunk-works@netwrx1.org Sun Sep 22 10:25:02 2013 > Received: from apollo.netwrx1.com ([108.76.168.147]:2234 helo=saturn.netwrx1.org) > by dagobah.betteresolution.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) > (envelope-from ) > id 1VNnP3-0002hy-MW > for john@blackbirds.net; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 10:25:02 -0700 > Received: from APOLLO ([127.0.0.1]) by netwrx1.org with MailEnable ESMTP; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:25:00 -0500 > To: john@blackbirds.net > From: "hilltop40@earthlink.net" > Subject: skunk-works Re: [] Your email requires verificationverify#MWy8nk505i7ELAuFwij9h-1379511407) > Reply-To: skunk-works@netwrx1.org > X-Mailer: GroupMAN Listserver1.8 Build 2199 > Comments: Discussion List Software at http://groupman.tnlsoft.com > Errors-To: gkasica@netwrx1.com > Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Message-ID: <776a5a1c0003ab07dd@[108.76.168.147]> > Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:25:00 -0500 > X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 > X-Spam-Score: -18 > X-Spam-Bar: - > X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "dagobah.betteresolution.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see root\@localhost for details. > > Content preview: > > Content analysis details: (-1.9 points, 5.0 required) > > pts rule name description > ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- > -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% > [score: 0.0000] > X-Spam-Flag: NO > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > From: "hilltop40@earthlink.net" > Subject: Re: [] Your email requires verificationverify#BPoTgiVEUCF_IVVCL2FIO-1379515742) > Date: 09-22-2013 > > > > > -----Original Message----- >> From: john@blackbirds.net >> Sent: Sep 18, 2013 7:52 AM >> To: hilltop40@earthlink.net >> Subject: [skunk-works] Your email requires verification >> verify#BPoTgiVEUCF_IVVCL2FIO-1379515742) >> >> The message you sent requires that you verify that you are a real live >> human being and not a spam source. >> >> >> To complete this verification, simply reply to this message and leave >> the subject line intact or click the link below: >> >> http://www.blackbirds.net/cgi-sys/bxd.cgi?a=john@blackbirds.net&id=BPoT >> giVEUCF_IVVCL2FIO-1379515742 >> >> The headers of the message sent from your address are shown below: >> > >From markr@signal100.com Wed Sep 18 07:49:02 2013 >> Received: from apollo.netwrx1.com ([108.76.168.147]:1632 helo=saturn.netwrx1.org) >> by dagobah.betteresolution.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) >> (envelope-from ) >> id 1VMJ3t-0001uW-CL >> for john@blackbirds.net; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 07:49:02 -0700 >> Received: from APOLLO ([127.0.0.1]) by netwrx1.org with MailEnable >> ESMTP; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 09:48:59 -0500 >> To: john@blackbirds.net >> From: Mark Rousell >> Subject: [skunk-works] Re: New Skunk Works Commands >> Reply-To: skunk-works@netwrx1.org >> X-Mailer: GroupMAN Listserver1.8 Build 2199 >> Comments: Discussion List Software at http://groupman.tnlsoft.com >> Errors-To: gkasica@netwrx1.com >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >> MIME-Version: 1.0 >> Message-ID: <6242169003042f07dd@[108.76.168.147]> >> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 09:48:59 -0500 >> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 >> X-Spam-Score: -18 >> X-Spam-Bar: - >> X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system >> "dagobah.betteresolution.net", has identified this incoming email as >> possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you >> can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you >> have any questions, see root\@localhost for details. >> >> Content preview: On 18/09/2013 14:35, George Kasica wrote: > Let me look into >> the digest issue here. Given the low traffic I'm not sure > it makes sense >> to even have a digest mode at this point. I only signed up to the digest >> version of the list (several years ago now) in addition to the normal list >> because I realised that, at that time, not all posts were reaching me via >> the normal list. By being a member of both I could be reasonably sure I was >> getting everything one way or another. I never did figure out where/why the >> posts were going astray. [...] >> >> Content analysis details: (-1.9 points, 5.0 required) >> >> pts rule name description >> ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- >> -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% >> [score: 0.0000] >> X-Spam-Flag: NO >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > From: john@blackbirds.net > Subject: Re: Re: [] Your email requires verification > Date: 09-22-2013 > > This message is a reply to a boxtrapper verification message. > > No action is needed on your part. > > If you were expecting to be added to the users whitelist please ensure that the verification email you responded to contained the correct verify string in the subject. Boxtrapper saw the verification key as "BPoTgiVEUCF_IVVCL2FIO-1379515742". > > The headers of the message sent from your address are shown below: > > >From skunk-works@netwrx1.org Sun Sep 22 10:27:38 2013 > Received: from apollo.netwrx1.com ([108.76.168.147]:2537 helo=saturn.netwrx1.org) > by dagobah.betteresolution.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) > (envelope-from ) > id 1VNnRZ-0002tU-HR > for john@blackbirds.net; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 10:27:38 -0700 > Received: from APOLLO ([127.0.0.1]) by netwrx1.org with MailEnable ESMTP; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:27:37 -0500 > To: john@blackbirds.net > From: "hilltop40@earthlink.net" > Subject: skunk-works Re: [] Your email requires verificationverify#BPoTgiVEUCF_IVVCL2FIO-1379515742) > Reply-To: skunk-works@netwrx1.org > X-Mailer: GroupMAN Listserver1.8 Build 2199 > Comments: Discussion List Software at http://groupman.tnlsoft.com > Errors-To: gkasica@netwrx1.com > Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Message-ID: <776cc09c00042707dd@[108.76.168.147]> > Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:27:37 -0500 > X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 > X-Spam-Score: -18 > X-Spam-Bar: - > X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "dagobah.betteresolution.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see root\@localhost for details. > > Content preview: > > Content analysis details: (-1.9 points, 5.0 required) > > pts rule name description > ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- > -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% > [score: 0.0000] > X-Spam-Flag: NO > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > From: George Kasica > Subject: Re: Re: Message Digest for 09/23/2013 > Date: 09-23-2013 > > Ignore it someone's spam filter needs tuning...sorry about the noise but until I figure out who and unsub them we will have a bit of this junk. > > George > > > --- > George R. Kasica > Sent from my iPhone5 > >> On Sep 23, 2013, at 12:29, "Karen Mass" wrote: >> >>> On 9/23/2013 12:28 AM, skunk-works wrote: >>> Here is your digest of messages for skunk-works. >>> >>> >>> >>> From: "hilltop40@earthlink.net" >>> Subject: Re: [] Your email requires verificationverify#zWSz37hMbInpT22hGDdVp-1379491387) >>> Date: 09-22-2013 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: john@blackbirds.net, skunk-works@netwrx1.org >>>> Sent: Sep 18, 2013 1:11 AM >>>> To: hilltop40@earthlink.net >>>> Subject: [skunk-works] Your email requires verification verify#zWSz37hMbInpT22hGDdVp-1379491387) >>>> >>>> The message you sent requires that you verify that you >>>> are a real live human being and not a spam source. >>>> >>>> >>>> To complete this verification, simply reply to this message and leave >>>> the subject line intact or click the link below: >>>> >>>> http://www.blackbirds.net/cgi-sys/bxd.cgi?a=john@blackbirds.net&id=zWSz37hMbInpT22hGDdVp-1379491387 >>>> >>>> The headers of the message sent from your address are shown below: >>>> >>>> From skunk-works@netwrx1.org Wed Sep 18 01:03:07 2013 >>>> Received: from apollo.netwrx1.com ([108.76.168.147]:2973 helo=saturn.netwrx1.org) >>>> by dagobah.betteresolution.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) >>>> (envelope-from ) >>>> id 1VMCj4-0004Ot-2M >>>> for john@blackbirds.net; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 01:03:07 -0700 >>>> Received: from APOLLO ([127.0.0.1]) by netwrx1.org with MailEnable ESMTP; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 03:03:02 -0500 >>>> To: john@blackbirds.net >>>> From: JW Kenney >>>> Subject: [skunk-works] 18Sept - Re: Message Digest for 09/18/2013 >>>> Reply-To: skunk-works@netwrx1.org >>>> X-Mailer: GroupMAN Listserver1.8 Build 2199 >>>> Comments: Discussion List Software at http://groupman.tnlsoft.com >>>> Errors-To: gkasica@netwrx1.com >>>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable >>>> Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 >>>> MIME-Version: 1.0 >>>> Message-ID: <60ce6ce60303e307dd@[108.76.168.147]> >>>> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 03:03:02 -0500 >>>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 >>>> X-Spam-Score: 7 >>>> X-Spam-Bar: / >>>> X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "dagobah.betteresolution.net", has >>>> identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message >>>> has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label >>>> similar future email. If you have any questions, see >>>> root\@localhost for details. >>>> >>>> Content preview: NOTHNING was sent with email to us. Jack Kenney [...] >>>> >>>> Content analysis details: (0.7 points, 5.0 required) >>>> >>>> pts rule name description >>>> ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- >>>> -0.0 BAYES_40 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 20 to 40% >>>> [score: 0.2550] >>>> 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message >>>> 0.0 HTML_FONT_SIZE_LARGE BODY: HTML font size is large >>>> 0.7 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts >>>> X-Spam-Flag: NO >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------- >>> From: john@blackbirds.net >>> Subject: Re: Re: [] Your email requires verification >>> Date: 09-22-2013 >>> >>> This message is a reply to a boxtrapper verification message. >>> >>> No action is needed on your part. >>> >>> If you were expecting to be added to the users whitelist please ensure that >>> the verification email you responded to contained the correct verify string >>> in the subject. Boxtrapper saw the verification key as "zWSz37hMbInpT22hGDdVp-1379491387". >>> >>> The headers of the message sent from your address are shown below: >>> >>>> From skunk-works@netwrx1.org Sun Sep 22 10:18:47 2013 >>> Received: from apollo.netwrx1.com ([108.76.168.147]:1869 helo=saturn.netwrx1.org) >>> by dagobah.betteresolution.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) >>> (envelope-from ) >>> id 1VNnJ0-0002Ra-4Y >>> for john@blackbirds.net; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 10:18:47 -0700 >>> Received: from APOLLO ([127.0.0.1]) by netwrx1.org with MailEnable ESMTP; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:18:43 -0500 >>> To: john@blackbirds.net >>> From: "hilltop40@earthlink.net" >>> Subject: skunk-works Re: [] Your email requires verificationverify#zWSz37hMbInpT22hGDdVp-1379491387) >>> Reply-To: skunk-works@netwrx1.org >>> X-Mailer: GroupMAN Listserver1.8 Build 2199 >>> Comments: Discussion List Software at http://groupman.tnlsoft.com >>> Errors-To: gkasica@netwrx1.com >>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >>> MIME-Version: 1.0 >>> Message-ID: <77649b890003e807dd@[108.76.168.147]> >>> Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:18:43 -0500 >>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 >>> X-Spam-Score: -18 >>> X-Spam-Bar: - >>> X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "dagobah.betteresolution.net", has >>> identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message >>> has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label >>> similar future email. If you have any questions, see >>> root\@localhost for details. >>> >>> Content preview: >>> >>> Content analysis details: (-1.9 points, 5.0 required) >>> >>> pts rule name description >>> ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- >>> -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% >>> [score: 0.0000] >>> X-Spam-Flag: NO >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------- >>> From: "hilltop40@earthlink.net" >>> Subject: Re: [] Your email requires verificationverify#MWy8nk505i7ELAuFwij9h-1379511407) >>> Date: 09-22-2013 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: john@blackbirds.net >>>> Sent: Sep 18, 2013 6:47 AM >>>> To: hilltop40@earthlink.net >>>> Subject: [skunk-works] Your email requires verification verify#MWy8nk505i7ELAuFwij9h-1379511407) >>>> >>>> The message you sent requires that you verify that you >>>> are a real live human being and not a spam source. >>>> >>>> >>>> To complete this verification, simply reply to this message and leave >>>> the subject line intact or click the link below: >>>> >>>> http://www.blackbirds.net/cgi-sys/bxd.cgi?a=john@blackbirds.net&id=MWy8nk505i7ELAuFwij9h-1379511407 >>>> >>>> The headers of the message sent from your address are shown below: >>>> >>>> From miltech.fms@gmail.com Wed Sep 18 06:36:47 2013 >>>> Received: from apollo.netwrx1.com ([108.76.168.147]:2293 helo=saturn.netwrx1.org) >>>> by dagobah.betteresolution.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) >>>> (envelope-from ) >>>> id 1VMHvy-0005J4-BF >>>> for john@blackbirds.net; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 06:36:47 -0700 >>>> Received: from APOLLO ([127.0.0.1]) by netwrx1.org with MailEnable ESMTP; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 08:36:43 -0500 >>>> To: john@blackbirds.net >>>> From: "miltech.fms" >>>> Subject: [skunk-works] Re: RE: Re: Message Digest for 09/18/2013 >>>> Reply-To: skunk-works@netwrx1.org >>>> X-Mailer: GroupMAN Listserver1.8 Build 2199 >>>> Comments: Discussion List Software at http://groupman.tnlsoft.com >>>> Errors-To: gkasica@netwrx1.com >>>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable >>>> Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 >>>> MIME-Version: 1.0 >>>> Message-ID: <61ffea430304c207dd@[108.76.168.147]> >>>> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 08:36:43 -0500 >>>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 >>>> X-Spam-Score: 8 >>>> X-Spam-Bar: / >>>> X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "dagobah.betteresolution.net", has >>>> identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message >>>> has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label >>>> similar future email. If you have any questions, see >>>> root\@localhost for details. >>>> >>>> Content preview: On 18 September 2013 22:26, George Kasica >>>> wrote: Here's the info again: Moving the Skunk-woks and skunk-works digest >>>> is complete. [...] >>>> >>>> Content analysis details: (0.8 points, 5.0 required) >>>> >>>> pts rule name description >>>> ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- >>>> 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider >>>> (miltech.fms[at]gmail.com) >>>> 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is >>>> CUSTOM_MED >>>> 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) >>>> -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% >>>> [score: 0.0000] >>>> 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message >>>> 0.7 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts >>>> 0.4 HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG HTML-only message, but there is no HTML tag >>>> 0.9 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED ADSP custom_med hit, and not from a mailing list >>>> X-Spam-Flag: NO >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------- >>> From: "hilltop40@earthlink.net" >>> Subject: Re: [] Your email requires verificationverify#MWy8nk505i7ELAuFwij9h-1379511407) >>> Date: 09-22-2013 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: john@blackbirds.net >>>> Sent: Sep 18, 2013 6:47 AM >>>> To: hilltop40@earthlink.net >>>> Subject: [skunk-works] Your email requires verification verify#MWy8nk505i7ELAuFwij9h-1379511407) >>>> >>>> The message you sent requires that you verify that you >>>> are a real live human being and not a spam source. >>>> >>>> >>>> To complete this verification, simply reply to this message and leave >>>> the subject line intact or click the link below: >>>> >>>> http://www.blackbirds.net/cgi-sys/bxd.cgi?a=john@blackbirds.net&id=MWy8nk505i7ELAuFwij9h-1379511407 >>>> >>>> The headers of the message sent from your address are shown below: >>>> >>>> From miltech.fms@gmail.com Wed Sep 18 06:36:47 2013 >>>> Received: from apollo.netwrx1.com ([108.76.168.147]:2293 helo=saturn.netwrx1.org) >>>> by dagobah.betteresolution.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) >>>> (envelope-from ) >>>> id 1VMHvy-0005J4-BF >>>> for john@blackbirds.net; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 06:36:47 -0700 >>>> Received: from APOLLO ([127.0.0.1]) by netwrx1.org with MailEnable ESMTP; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 08:36:43 -0500 >>>> To: john@blackbirds.net >>>> From: "miltech.fms" >>>> Subject: [skunk-works] Re: RE: Re: Message Digest for 09/18/2013 >>>> Reply-To: skunk-works@netwrx1.org >>>> X-Mailer: GroupMAN Listserver1.8 Build 2199 >>>> Comments: Discussion List Software at http://groupman.tnlsoft.com >>>> Errors-To: gkasica@netwrx1.com >>>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable >>>> Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 >>>> MIME-Version: 1.0 >>>> Message-ID: <61ffea430304c207dd@[108.76.168.147]> >>>> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 08:36:43 -0500 >>>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 >>>> X-Spam-Score: 8 >>>> X-Spam-Bar: / >>>> X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "dagobah.betteresolution.net", has >>>> identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message >>>> has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label >>>> similar future email. If you have any questions, see >>>> root\@localhost for details. >>>> >>>> Content preview: On 18 September 2013 22:26, George Kasica >>>> wrote: Here's the info again: Moving the Skunk-woks and skunk-works digest >>>> is complete. [...] >>>> >>>> Content analysis details: (0.8 points, 5.0 required) >>>> >>>> pts rule name description >>>> ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- >>>> 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider >>>> (miltech.fms[at]gmail.com) >>>> 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is >>>> CUSTOM_MED >>>> 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) >>>> -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% >>>> [score: 0.0000] >>>> 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message >>>> 0.7 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts >>>> 0.4 HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG HTML-only message, but there is no HTML tag >>>> 0.9 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED ADSP custom_med hit, and not from a mailing list >>>> X-Spam-Flag: NO >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------- >>> From: john@blackbirds.net >>> Subject: Re: Re: [] Your email requires verification >>> Date: 09-22-2013 >>> >>> This message is a reply to a boxtrapper verification message. >>> >>> No action is needed on your part. >>> >>> If you were expecting to be added to the users whitelist please ensure that >>> the verification email you responded to contained the correct verify string >>> in the subject. Boxtrapper saw the verification key as "MWy8nk505i7ELAuFwij9h-1379511407". >>> >>> The headers of the message sent from your address are shown below: >>> >>>> From skunk-works@netwrx1.org Sun Sep 22 10:23:22 2013 >>> Received: from apollo.netwrx1.com ([108.76.168.147]:2117 helo=saturn.netwrx1.org) >>> by dagobah.betteresolution.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) >>> (envelope-from ) >>> id 1VNnNR-0002gP-KU >>> for john@blackbirds.net; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 10:23:22 -0700 >>> Received: from APOLLO ([127.0.0.1]) by netwrx1.org with MailEnable ESMTP; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:23:21 -0500 >>> To: john@blackbirds.net >>> From: "hilltop40@earthlink.net" >>> Subject: skunk-works Re: [] Your email requires verificationverify#MWy8nk505i7ELAuFwij9h-1379511407) >>> Reply-To: skunk-works@netwrx1.org >>> X-Mailer: GroupMAN Listserver1.8 Build 2199 >>> Comments: Discussion List Software at http://groupman.tnlsoft.com >>> Errors-To: gkasica@netwrx1.com >>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >>> MIME-Version: 1.0 >>> Message-ID: <7768d71600043e07dd@[108.76.168.147]> >>> Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:23:20 -0500 >>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 >>> X-Spam-Score: -18 >>> X-Spam-Bar: - >>> X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "dagobah.betteresolution.net", has >>> identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message >>> has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label >>> similar future email. If you have any questions, see >>> root\@localhost for details. >>> >>> Content preview: >>> >>> Content analysis details: (-1.9 points, 5.0 required) >>> >>> pts rule name description >>> ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- >>> -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% >>> [score: 0.0000] >>> X-Spam-Flag: NO >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------- >>> From: john@blackbirds.net >>> Subject: Re: Re: [] Your email requires verification >>> Date: 09-22-2013 >>> >>> This message is a reply to a boxtrapper verification message. >>> >>> No action is needed on your part. >>> >>> If you were expecting to be added to the users whitelist please ensure that >>> the verification email you responded to contained the correct verify string >>> in the subject. Boxtrapper saw the verification key as "MWy8nk505i7ELAuFwij9h-1379511407". >>> >>> The headers of the message sent from your address are shown below: >>> >>>> From skunk-works@netwrx1.org Sun Sep 22 10:25:02 2013 >>> Received: from apollo.netwrx1.com ([108.76.168.147]:2234 helo=saturn.netwrx1.org) >>> by dagobah.betteresolution.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) >>> (envelope-from ) >>> id 1VNnP3-0002hy-MW >>> for john@blackbirds.net; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 10:25:02 -0700 >>> Received: from APOLLO ([127.0.0.1]) by netwrx1.org with MailEnable ESMTP; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:25:00 -0500 >>> To: john@blackbirds.net >>> From: "hilltop40@earthlink.net" >>> Subject: skunk-works Re: [] Your email requires verificationverify#MWy8nk505i7ELAuFwij9h-1379511407) >>> Reply-To: skunk-works@netwrx1.org >>> X-Mailer: GroupMAN Listserver1.8 Build 2199 >>> Comments: Discussion List Software at http://groupman.tnlsoft.com >>> Errors-To: gkasica@netwrx1.com >>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >>> MIME-Version: 1.0 >>> Message-ID: <776a5a1c0003ab07dd@[108.76.168.147]> >>> Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:25:00 -0500 >>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 >>> X-Spam-Score: -18 >>> X-Spam-Bar: - >>> X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "dagobah.betteresolution.net", has >>> identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message >>> has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label >>> similar future email. If you have any questions, see >>> root\@localhost for details. >>> >>> Content preview: >>> >>> Content analysis details: (-1.9 points, 5.0 required) >>> >>> pts rule name description >>> ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- >>> -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% >>> [score: 0.0000] >>> X-Spam-Flag: NO >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------- >>> From: "hilltop40@earthlink.net" >>> Subject: Re: [] Your email requires verificationverify#BPoTgiVEUCF_IVVCL2FIO-1379515742) >>> Date: 09-22-2013 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: john@blackbirds.net >>>> Sent: Sep 18, 2013 7:52 AM >>>> To: hilltop40@earthlink.net >>>> Subject: [skunk-works] Your email requires verification verify#BPoTgiVEUCF_IVVCL2FIO-1379515742) >>>> >>>> The message you sent requires that you verify that you >>>> are a real live human being and not a spam source. >>>> >>>> >>>> To complete this verification, simply reply to this message and leave >>>> the subject line intact or click the link below: >>>> >>>> http://www.blackbirds.net/cgi-sys/bxd.cgi?a=john@blackbirds.net&id=BPoTgiVEUCF_IVVCL2FIO-1379515742 >>>> >>>> The headers of the message sent from your address are shown below: >>>> >>>> From markr@signal100.com Wed Sep 18 07:49:02 2013 >>>> Received: from apollo.netwrx1.com ([108.76.168.147]:1632 helo=saturn.netwrx1.org) >>>> by dagobah.betteresolution.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) >>>> (envelope-from ) >>>> id 1VMJ3t-0001uW-CL >>>> for john@blackbirds.net; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 07:49:02 -0700 >>>> Received: from APOLLO ([127.0.0.1]) by netwrx1.org with MailEnable ESMTP; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 09:48:59 -0500 >>>> To: john@blackbirds.net >>>> From: Mark Rousell >>>> Subject: [skunk-works] Re: New Skunk Works Commands >>>> Reply-To: skunk-works@netwrx1.org >>>> X-Mailer: GroupMAN Listserver1.8 Build 2199 >>>> Comments: Discussion List Software at http://groupman.tnlsoft.com >>>> Errors-To: gkasica@netwrx1.com >>>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >>>> MIME-Version: 1.0 >>>> Message-ID: <6242169003042f07dd@[108.76.168.147]> >>>> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 09:48:59 -0500 >>>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 >>>> X-Spam-Score: -18 >>>> X-Spam-Bar: - >>>> X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "dagobah.betteresolution.net", has >>>> identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message >>>> has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label >>>> similar future email. If you have any questions, see >>>> root\@localhost for details. >>>> >>>> Content preview: On 18/09/2013 14:35, George Kasica wrote: > Let me look into >>>> the digest issue here. Given the low traffic I'm not sure > it makes sense >>>> to even have a digest mode at this point. I only signed up to the digest >>>> version of the list (several years ago now) in addition to the normal list >>>> because I realised that, at that time, not all posts were reaching me via >>>> the normal list. By being a member of both I could be reasonably sure I was >>>> getting everything one way or another. I never did figure out where/why the >>>> posts were going astray. [...] >>>> >>>> Content analysis details: (-1.9 points, 5.0 required) >>>> >>>> pts rule name description >>>> ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- >>>> -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% >>>> [score: 0.0000] >>>> X-Spam-Flag: NO >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------- >>> From: john@blackbirds.net >>> Subject: Re: Re: [] Your email requires verification >>> Date: 09-22-2013 >>> >>> This message is a reply to a boxtrapper verification message. >>> >>> No action is needed on your part. >>> >>> If you were expecting to be added to the users whitelist please ensure that >>> the verification email you responded to contained the correct verify string >>> in the subject. Boxtrapper saw the verification key as "BPoTgiVEUCF_IVVCL2FIO-1379515742". >>> >>> The headers of the message sent from your address are shown below: >>> >>>> From skunk-works@netwrx1.org Sun Sep 22 10:27:38 2013 >>> Received: from apollo.netwrx1.com ([108.76.168.147]:2537 helo=saturn.netwrx1.org) >>> by dagobah.betteresolution.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) >>> (envelope-from ) >>> id 1VNnRZ-0002tU-HR >>> for john@blackbirds.net; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 10:27:38 -0700 >>> Received: from APOLLO ([127.0.0.1]) by netwrx1.org with MailEnable ESMTP; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:27:37 -0500 >>> To: john@blackbirds.net >>> From: "hilltop40@earthlink.net" >>> Subject: skunk-works Re: [] Your email requires verificationverify#BPoTgiVEUCF_IVVCL2FIO-1379515742) >>> Reply-To: skunk-works@netwrx1.org >>> X-Mailer: GroupMAN Listserver1.8 Build 2199 >>> Comments: Discussion List Software at http://groupman.tnlsoft.com >>> Errors-To: gkasica@netwrx1.com >>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >>> MIME-Version: 1.0 >>> Message-ID: <776cc09c00042707dd@[108.76.168.147]> >>> Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:27:37 -0500 >>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 >>> X-Spam-Score: -18 >>> X-Spam-Bar: - >>> X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "dagobah.betteresolution.net", has >>> identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message >>> has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label >>> similar future email. If you have any questions, see >>> root\@localhost for details. >>> >>> Content preview: >>> >>> Content analysis details: (-1.9 points, 5.0 required) >>> >>> pts rule name description >>> ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- >>> -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% >>> [score: 0.0000] >>> X-Spam-Flag: NO >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------- >> i'm really here, alive and breathing! >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > From: Bill Jones > Subject: Message Digest for 09/23/2013 > Date: 09-23-2013 > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > From: "miltech.fms" > Subject: Re: Message Digest for 09/23/2013 > Date: 09-23-2013 > > empty message? > > > On 24 September 2013 09:56, Bill Jones wrote: > >> > i'm really here and would like to keep receiving the digest. if the digest is discontinued due to low activity level, i would like to receive the individual posts to the mail list. thank you karen mass --------------------------------------------------------------- From: James Stevenson Subject: Test Date: 09-24-2013 This is a test message. Jim Stevenson --------------------------------------------------------------- From: George Kasica Subject: Re: Test Date: 09-24-2013 Looks like it passed jim. --- George R. Kasica Sent from my iPhone5 > On Sep 24, 2013, at 9:40, "James Stevenson" wrote: > > This is a test message. > > Jim Stevenson > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- From: James Stevenson Subject: Re: Re: Test Date: 09-24-2013 Indeed. On Sep 24, 2013, at 3:11 PM, George Kasica wrote: > Looks like it passed jim. > > --- > George R. Kasica > Sent from my iPhone5 > >> On Sep 24, 2013, at 9:40, "James Stevenson" wrote: >> >> This is a test message. >> >> Jim Stevenson >> >> >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- From: James Stevenson Subject: Marketing Research Date: 09-24-2013 I am considering bringing back two of my books that are out of print. The first is The $5 Billion Misunderstanding: The Collapse of the Navy's Stealth Bomber Program It originally sold for $49.95 from the Naval Institute Press but has been out of print for years. It sells on the used market, depending on condition, for between $80 and $150 depending on condition. I would be interested in your interest, if any, and if so, what you would consider a reasonable price for a paperback version and an eBook version. The second book is The Pentagon Paradox, a history of the development of the F-18. Same question. I thank you for your help. Jim Stevenson ---------------------------------------------------------------